AP US History Score Calculator: Complete Guide

This AP US History Score Calculator estimates your AP U.S. History score from the current APUSH exam structure: 55 multiple-choice questions, 3 short-answer questions, 1 document-based question, and 1 long essay question. It is built for students who want an instant APUSH composite estimate and a practical breakdown of where their score is coming from. Instead of adding raw points in a way that distorts the exam weights, this calculator applies the actual section weighting: 40% for multiple choice, 20% for short-answer questions, 25% for the DBQ, and 15% for the LEQ.

The tool includes two writing-section input modes. The rubric-style mode is best when you are scoring your own APUSH practice work and want to estimate the major rubric categories. It lets you enter SAQ points, DBQ thesis, contextualization, document evidence, outside evidence, sourcing or analysis, complexity, and LEQ thesis, context, evidence, reasoning, and complexity. The simple raw mode is best when your teacher has already given you a raw SAQ score out of 9, a DBQ score out of 7, and an LEQ score out of 6. Both modes produce the same weighted composite once the raw section scores are known.

The best use of this APUSH calculator is diagnostic. After a practice exam, enter your scores and compare your MCQ accuracy with your writing-section weighted performance. If your multiple-choice performance is lower, focus on stimulus analysis, historical period review, and practice with primary and secondary sources. If your writing performance is lower, focus on thesis writing, contextualization, document use, outside evidence, sourcing, and historical reasoning. AP U.S. History is not only a memorization test. It rewards source interpretation, evidence selection, argumentation, causation, comparison, continuity and change over time, and clear historical writing.

Current AP U.S. History exam format

The AP U.S. History exam lasts 3 hours and 15 minutes. The exam is divided into two main sections, and each main section has two parts. Section I includes multiple choice and short answer. Section II includes the DBQ and LEQ. The multiple-choice section has 55 questions in 55 minutes and counts for 40% of the exam score. The short-answer section has 3 questions in 40 minutes and counts for 20% of the exam score. The DBQ gives students 60 minutes, including a 15-minute reading period, and counts for 25% of the exam score. The LEQ gives students 40 minutes and counts for 15% of the exam score.

The multiple-choice section is stimulus-based. Questions usually appear in sets based on the same source, which may be a primary source, secondary source, image, chart, graph, map, excerpt, political cartoon, or historical interpretation. This means APUSH multiple choice is not only about recalling facts. A strong student must identify the period, understand the source, connect it to historical context, and choose the answer that best fits the evidence. Many wrong answers are historically related but not supported by the stimulus.

The short-answer section requires direct, concise historical responses. Students usually answer two required questions and then choose between two options for the third short-answer question. Each SAQ is commonly scored out of 3 points, so the total SAQ raw score is out of 9. SAQs reward focused writing. Long introductions and broad background paragraphs are not necessary. A strong SAQ answer directly addresses the prompt, uses specific historical evidence, and explains the connection clearly.

The DBQ asks students to develop an argument using a set of historical documents and relevant outside evidence. It is the most heavily weighted written task, counting for 25% of the exam score. A high-scoring DBQ needs a defensible thesis, broader contextualization, evidence from documents, evidence beyond the documents, source analysis, and possibly complexity. The LEQ asks students to develop an argument from their knowledge of U.S. history without a document set. It rewards thesis, context, evidence, historical reasoning, and complexity.

How the APUSH scoring formula works

The APUSH exam has different raw point totals in each section, so raw points cannot be added directly without weighting. Multiple choice is out of 55 but counts for 40%. SAQs are out of 9 but count for 20%. The DBQ is out of 7 but counts for 25%. The LEQ is out of 6 but counts for 15%. This calculator scales each section to its exam weight and then adds the section contributions into a composite score out of 100.

In these formulas, \(M\) is your multiple-choice raw score out of 55, \(S\) is your SAQ raw score out of 9, \(D\) is your DBQ raw score out of 7, and \(L\) is your LEQ raw score out of 6. The weighted values \(M_w\), \(S_w\), \(D_w\), and \(L_w\) add to the composite score \(C\), which is out of 100. The predicted AP score is then estimated from the selected score-band model.

For example, suppose a student answers 34 of 55 MCQs correctly, earns 6 of 9 SAQ points, earns 4 of 7 DBQ points, and earns 4 of 6 LEQ points. The MCQ contribution is \(34/55\times40=24.73\). The SAQ contribution is \(6/9\times20=13.33\). The DBQ contribution is \(4/7\times25=14.29\). The LEQ contribution is \(4/6\times15=10.00\). The composite is \(24.73+13.33+14.29+10.00=62.35\). Under this calculator’s default curve, that is in the estimated AP 4 range.

Why raw totals should not be used alone

A common mistake is adding \(M+S+D+L\) and comparing that number to a percent score. For example, a student might add 34 MCQ points, 6 SAQ points, 4 DBQ points, and 4 LEQ points to get 48 raw points out of 77. That raw total does not represent the official exam weighting. Multiple choice has many more raw points than the DBQ or LEQ, but the DBQ is worth 25% of the exam. The LEQ has only 6 raw points but still counts for 15%. The correct approach is to scale each section first.

On the 100-point composite scale, one MCQ raw point is worth about \(40/55=0.727\) composite points. One SAQ raw point is worth about \(20/9=2.222\) composite points. One DBQ raw point is worth about \(25/7=3.571\) composite points. One LEQ raw point is worth \(15/6=2.5\) composite points. That does not mean one section is easier or harder. It means the raw point systems differ. A single DBQ point can move the composite more than several MCQs, so writing practice matters.

Estimated APUSH score bands

The default score-band model in this calculator places an estimated AP 5 around 75 composite points, an AP 4 around 58, an AP 3 around 42, and an AP 2 around 30. These cutoffs are practical planning estimates, not official annual cut scores. APUSH score conversion can shift because exam forms and score-setting processes can vary. The strict curve raises the cutoffs for conservative planning. The generous curve lowers the cutoffs for unusually difficult practice material. The custom curve lets you enter your teacher’s conversion table.

Use score bands as margin indicators. If your composite is barely above your target score cutoff, the score is not secure. A few missed MCQs, a weaker DBQ, or an over-scored LEQ could move the estimate down. If your composite is several points above the cutoff, your prediction is more stable. A practical target is to build at least a 4–6 point cushion above the score band you want. In APUSH, that cushion might come from several MCQs, one or two SAQ points, one DBQ point, one LEQ point, or a combination.

Understanding the 2025 AP U.S. History score distribution

The official 2025 AP U.S. History score distribution provides useful national context. In 2025, 14.1% of students earned a 5, 36.2% earned a 4, 23.3% earned a 3, 18.4% earned a 2, and 8.0% earned a 1. The percentage of students earning a 3 or higher was 73.6%, and the mean score was 3.30. The total number of students in the 2025 AP U.S. History distribution was 518,247. These numbers show a strong year of APUSH outcomes, but they do not reveal a fixed raw-score conversion table.

A score distribution is an outcome summary. It tells you how students performed after official scoring and score setting. It does not prove that a specific practice raw score will always become the same AP score. Practice exams differ in difficulty, writing rubrics are applied to specific prompts, and official score conversions can shift. That is why this calculator includes editable curves and clearly labels the result as an estimate. Use the 2025 distribution as context and use this calculator as a planning model.

What each APUSH score means

An AP score of 5 means “extremely well qualified.” In AP U.S. History, this usually reflects strong source analysis, broad historical knowledge, accurate periodization, effective writing, and consistent argumentation. A 5-level student can interpret unfamiliar sources, identify historical context, use evidence accurately, and write a DBQ or LEQ with a defensible argument. A 5 does not require perfection. Students can miss MCQs and lose writing points while still reaching the top band if the composite remains high enough.

An AP score of 4 means “well qualified.” This is a strong score and often reflects good command of the course. Students in the 4 range usually understand major periods and themes but may lose points on complex document analysis, outside evidence, SAQ precision, or LEQ reasoning. Moving from a 4 to a 5 often requires improving precision rather than simply memorizing more facts. The student needs stronger sourcing, sharper contextualization, more specific evidence, and fewer stimulus-reading mistakes.

An AP score of 3 means “qualified.” Many colleges consider a 3 a passing AP score, although credit policies vary. A student in the 3 range often understands many major developments but may be inconsistent across periods or writing tasks. The most efficient path from a 3 to a 4 is usually targeted improvement: better MCQ stimulus analysis, more reliable SAQ evidence, a stronger DBQ thesis, and clearer LEQ reasoning. The calculator’s target planner can show whether the fastest route is MCQ improvement or writing-section improvement.

An AP score of 2 means “possibly qualified,” and a score of 1 means “no recommendation.” A low calculator estimate should be treated as diagnostic information. It usually means the student needs more structured review and more practice with AP-style tasks. APUSH is cumulative. Weak period knowledge affects MCQs. Weak contextualization affects DBQs and LEQs. Weak evidence selection affects every written section. Improvement comes from identifying the exact weak link and correcting it with focused practice.

Multiple-choice strategy

The multiple-choice section has 55 questions in 55 minutes. That means the average pace is about one minute per question. However, because questions appear in sets based on sources, the pacing is really stimulus-based. You may spend time reading a source and then answer three or four questions from it. The goal is to read efficiently, identify the period and point of view, and answer only what the question asks. Do not overread every source as if it were a DBQ document. Extract what is necessary and move on.

APUSH MCQs often test historical thinking rather than isolated recall. A question may ask for the broader context of a source, the author’s purpose, the audience, the historical development reflected in the source, a similar event in another period, or a limitation of the source. Some answer choices are true historical statements but not relevant to the stimulus. The correct answer must fit the evidence and the question stem.

When reviewing missed MCQs, classify the mistake. Was it a periodization error, content gap, source misread, vocabulary confusion, stimulus-context mismatch, or careless answer choice? This classification matters. A content gap requires review. A periodization error requires timeline work. A source misread requires practice with point of view, audience, purpose, and context. A careless answer choice requires slowing down and checking whether the answer actually responds to the question.

Short-answer strategy

The SAQ section includes 3 questions in 40 minutes and counts for 20% of the exam score. Each SAQ is commonly scored out of 3 points, with one point for each part. A strong SAQ answer is direct. It does not need an introduction, conclusion, or elaborate essay structure. It needs a clear answer, specific evidence, and a brief explanation. If the prompt has parts A, B, and C, answer in labeled parts. This helps you stay organized and helps the reader see each response.

SAQ writing should be concise but complete. A one-word answer usually is not enough. A long paragraph may waste time. The best response names the historical evidence and explains how it answers the prompt. For example, if asked to identify one cause of a historical development, do not only name “industrialization.” Explain how industrialization changed labor systems, migration patterns, political debates, or economic relationships in the specified period. The explanation is what turns a fact into an answer.

Common SAQ mistakes include answering outside the time period, using vague evidence, failing to respond to the exact verb, and repeating the same idea in multiple parts. If one part asks for a difference and another asks for a similarity, make the comparison explicit. If one part asks for a cause and another asks for an effect, do not blur them together. Each part is a separate scoring opportunity.

DBQ strategy

The DBQ is worth 25% of the APUSH exam score, so it can move the final composite significantly. It gives students a set of documents and asks them to develop an argument. A high-scoring DBQ is not a document summary. It is an argument that uses documents as evidence. The strongest DBQs have a defensible thesis, relevant contextualization, document evidence, outside evidence, sourcing or analysis, and possibly complexity.

The thesis should answer the prompt directly and make a historically defensible claim. A weak thesis restates the prompt. A stronger thesis establishes a line of argument. Contextualization should place the prompt in a broader historical setting. It should not be a random background paragraph. It should explain developments before, during, or around the topic that help the reader understand the argument.

Document evidence requires using the documents to support the argument. Do not merely quote or summarize. Explain how each document supports a claim. Outside evidence requires a specific piece of historical evidence not found in the documents. Sourcing or analysis requires explaining how the author’s point of view, purpose, audience, or historical situation matters. Complexity requires a nuanced argument, such as explaining multiple causes, weighing evidence, connecting periods, or acknowledging contradictions.

LEQ strategy

The LEQ is worth 15% of the exam score. It asks students to develop an argument from historical knowledge without a document set. The LEQ rewards a defensible thesis, contextualization, evidence, historical reasoning, and complexity. The three major historical reasoning patterns are causation, comparison, and continuity and change over time. A strong LEQ should clearly match the reasoning skill demanded by the prompt.

Because the LEQ has no documents, evidence selection is critical. Choose specific evidence that directly supports the thesis. Avoid broad claims like “many reforms happened” or “people disagreed.” Name laws, movements, groups, events, court cases, leaders, economic changes, wars, migrations, or policies. Then explain how the evidence supports the argument. Evidence without reasoning becomes a list. Reasoning without evidence becomes assertion.

For LEQ complexity, do not force an artificial paragraph. Complexity can come from qualifying the argument, explaining multiple causes, comparing different groups, showing change and continuity together, or connecting developments across periods. The safest path is still a clear thesis and strong evidence. Complexity is valuable, but it is not a substitute for the core rubric categories.

APUSH periods and exam weighting

AP U.S. History covers events and developments from 1491 to the present. The course is organized into nine chronological periods. The middle periods receive the most weight, especially Periods 3 through 8. Periods 1 and 9 are smaller by exam weighting, but they still matter. A student who ignores Period 1 may struggle with colonization and Native American context. A student who ignores Period 9 may struggle with modern political, economic, and social developments.

Period 1: 1491–1607

Period 1 focuses on Native American societies before European colonization, European exploration, the Columbian Exchange, and early contact. Students should understand that Native societies were diverse. They had different economies, political structures, settlement patterns, and relationships with the environment. The arrival of Europeans transformed the Americas through disease, trade, conquest, and exchange. This period often appears as context for later colonization and Native-European conflict.

High-yield concepts include maize agriculture, regional Native adaptations, Spanish colonization, the encomienda system, the Columbian Exchange, and early European competition. A strong APUSH answer does not treat Native peoples as a single group. It recognizes regional diversity and the impact of geography, environment, and contact.

Period 2: 1607–1754

Period 2 covers the development of British, Spanish, French, and Dutch colonies in North America. Students should understand differences among colonial regions, including New England, the Chesapeake, the Middle Colonies, and the Southern colonies. Labor systems, religion, economic goals, relations with Native peoples, and imperial policies differed by region. These differences later shaped American society and politics.

High-yield topics include Jamestown, Puritan New England, the Atlantic economy, slavery, indentured servitude, Bacon’s Rebellion, the Great Awakening, mercantilism, salutary neglect, and colonial resistance. This period is important for DBQ and LEQ context because it sets up later debates about independence, identity, and regional differences.

Period 3: 1754–1800

Period 3 includes the French and Indian War, imperial crisis, American Revolution, Articles of Confederation, Constitution, Bill of Rights, and early republic. This period is one of the most important in the course. Students should understand how imperial conflict and taxation disputes led to revolution, how revolutionary ideology developed, and how the new republic struggled with federal power, representation, rights, and political parties.

High-yield topics include the Proclamation of 1763, Stamp Act, Boston Tea Party, Declaration of Independence, republicanism, Articles of Confederation weaknesses, Constitutional Convention, Federalists and Anti-Federalists, Federalist Papers, Washington’s presidency, Hamilton’s financial plan, Whiskey Rebellion, and early party conflict. Questions often ask students to compare revolutionary ideals with political realities.

Period 4: 1800–1848

Period 4 covers the growth of democracy, market revolution, reform movements, expansion, and sectional change. Students should understand how the United States changed economically, politically, and socially in the early nineteenth century. The market revolution transformed labor, transportation, communication, and regional economies. Reform movements addressed religion, education, temperance, women’s rights, abolition, and prisons. Westward expansion intensified debates over Native removal and slavery.

High-yield topics include Jeffersonian democracy, Louisiana Purchase, War of 1812, Monroe Doctrine, Missouri Compromise, Jacksonian democracy, Indian Removal Act, Second Great Awakening, Seneca Falls, abolitionism, canals, railroads, factories, and the market revolution. Period 4 is strong for causation and continuity/change prompts.

Period 5: 1844–1877

Period 5 centers on territorial expansion, slavery, sectional conflict, Civil War, and Reconstruction. This is one of the most heavily tested periods. Students should understand how Manifest Destiny and western expansion intensified debates over slavery. The Civil War tested the Union and transformed the meaning of freedom, citizenship, and federal power. Reconstruction attempted to rebuild the South and define rights for formerly enslaved people, but it faced violent resistance and political compromise.

High-yield topics include annexation of Texas, Mexican-American War, Compromise of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott, Republican Party, Lincoln, secession, Emancipation Proclamation, 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, Freedmen’s Bureau, sharecropping, Black Codes, Ku Klux Klan, Radical Reconstruction, and Compromise of 1877. DBQ and LEQ prompts frequently use this period because it contains strong evidence for causation, comparison, and change over time.

Period 6: 1865–1898

Period 6 covers industrialization, urbanization, immigration, the Gilded Age, western expansion, labor conflict, and Populism. Students should understand how industrial capitalism transformed the economy and society. Big business, railroads, factories, and finance created new wealth and new inequalities. Immigration and urban growth changed American cities. Farmers and workers organized to resist economic pressures. Native Americans faced intensified displacement and federal assimilation policies.

High-yield topics include transcontinental railroads, Carnegie, Rockefeller, trusts, Social Darwinism, Gospel of Wealth, Knights of Labor, American Federation of Labor, Homestead Strike, Pullman Strike, Chinese Exclusion Act, settlement houses, political machines, Dawes Act, Ghost Dance, Populist Party, and the Omaha Platform. Period 6 often appears in prompts about economic change, labor, immigration, and federal policy.

Period 7: 1890–1945

Period 7 includes Progressivism, imperialism, World War I, the 1920s, Great Depression, New Deal, and World War II. Students should understand how the United States became more involved in global affairs and how reform movements responded to industrialization. The Progressive Era expanded regulation and democratic reforms. The Great Depression and New Deal transformed the role of the federal government. World War II reshaped the economy, society, and international position of the United States.

High-yield topics include muckrakers, Progressive reforms, Spanish-American War, Philippine-American War, Roosevelt Corollary, World War I, Red Scare, Harlem Renaissance, immigration restriction, consumer culture, stock market crash, New Deal programs, Social Security, labor rights, Pearl Harbor, home front mobilization, Japanese American incarceration, and wartime diplomacy. Period 7 is especially useful for DBQs because it includes many political cartoons, speeches, and reform documents.

Period 8: 1945–1980

Period 8 covers the Cold War, civil rights movement, suburbanization, economic growth, Vietnam War, Great Society, social movements, and political realignment. Students should understand how the Cold War shaped foreign and domestic policy. They should also understand how civil rights activism challenged segregation and discrimination. Postwar prosperity transformed housing, consumer culture, gender roles, and education, but inequalities remained.

High-yield topics include containment, Truman Doctrine, Marshall Plan, NATO, Korean War, McCarthyism, Brown v. Board of Education, Montgomery Bus Boycott, Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, Great Society, feminism, environmentalism, Vietnam War, counterculture, Watergate, and conservative responses. Period 8 often appears in comparison and continuity/change prompts because it includes both reform and backlash.

Period 9: 1980–Present

Period 9 covers modern politics, globalization, technology, demographic change, foreign policy, economic restructuring, and contemporary debates. It is a smaller exam-weight period, but it can appear in multiple choice and as context for long-term change. Students should understand the rise of modern conservatism, debates over government spending and regulation, globalization, immigration, terrorism, and changes in technology and culture.

High-yield topics include Reaganomics, Cold War ending, Iran-Contra, NAFTA, globalization, deindustrialization, immigration debates, September 11, War on Terror, partisan polarization, technology, social change, and economic inequality. Modern history can be useful for synthesis and complexity because it allows students to connect earlier developments to current patterns.

Historical thinking skills

APUSH tests historical thinking skills across all sections. These include developments and processes, sourcing and situation, claims and evidence, contextualization, making connections, and argumentation. Students should practice identifying not only what happened but also why it happened, how it changed over time, how it compared with other developments, and how evidence supports a historical claim. The strongest APUSH students think in relationships rather than isolated facts.

Contextualization is especially important for writing. It asks students to place an event or argument within a broader historical setting. A strong context sentence does more than mention a time period. It explains a relevant broader development. For example, a DBQ about the American Revolution could contextualize with imperial wars, Enlightenment ideas, British debt, and colonial resistance. A DBQ about the New Deal could contextualize with the Great Depression, banking crisis, unemployment, and earlier debates over federal power.

Claims and evidence matter in every written section. A claim is an argument, not a topic. Evidence is specific historical support, not vague background. Reasoning explains how evidence supports the claim. Many students have enough knowledge but lose points because they do not connect evidence to argument. The safest pattern is: claim, specific evidence, explanation of how the evidence supports the claim.

How to move from a 2 to a 3

Moving from a 2 to a 3 usually requires building reliable core knowledge and earning basic writing points. Start with timeline fluency. Know the major developments in each period and the order in which they occurred. Then practice stimulus-based MCQs and short-answer responses. Do not spend all your time passively rereading notes. APUSH improvement comes from applying knowledge to sources and prompts.

For writing, focus on direct points first. Write a defensible thesis. Add contextualization. Use specific evidence. Answer SAQ parts directly. Even if complexity is difficult, the core points can move your score into a passing range. For DBQs, learn to use documents as evidence instead of summarizing them. For LEQs, learn to organize evidence around a line of argument.

How to move from a 3 to a 4

Moving from a 3 to a 4 usually requires improving precision. Students in the 3 range often know the broad story but lose points on vague evidence, weak explanations, and incomplete document analysis. To move upward, practice using specific evidence and explaining its significance. Instead of writing “the government changed,” name the policy, law, court case, or institution and explain how it changed political power, economic relationships, social life, or regional development.

For MCQs, focus on stimulus analysis. Ask who created the source, when it was created, why it was created, and how it fits the period. For SAQs, answer each part with a direct claim and evidence. For DBQs, aim to use more documents than the minimum and include outside evidence. For LEQs, build body paragraphs around reasoning rather than chronology alone.

How to move from a 4 to a 5

Moving from a 4 to a 5 requires consistency and sophistication. Students near a 5 usually know the material but lose points through small errors: weak sourcing, thin complexity, misread documents, or missed MCQ nuance. To improve, score your practice writing strictly. Do not award yourself a point unless the response clearly satisfies the rubric. Rewrite weak thesis statements and vague evidence sentences until they become precise.

For MCQs, practice difficult source sets. For DBQs, practice sourcing documents by point of view, purpose, audience, or historical situation. For LEQs, practice adding complexity through qualification, counterargument, period connections, and multiple-cause reasoning. A 5-level response often shows control over nuance, not just a large list of facts.

Exam-day timing strategy

For multiple choice, you have 55 minutes for 55 questions. Work steadily and avoid spending too long on one stimulus set. If a source is confusing, use the question stem to focus your reading. If an answer choice is historically true but not supported by the stimulus, eliminate it. A reasoned guess is better than no answer.

For SAQs, budget about 13 minutes per question. Label parts A, B, and C. Write direct answers. For the DBQ, use the reading period to understand the prompt, group documents, and plan your thesis. For the LEQ, spend a few minutes planning before writing. A planned essay with specific evidence is stronger than a long essay that drifts from the prompt.

Common APUSH score calculator mistakes

The first mistake is using raw totals without weighting. MCQ, SAQ, DBQ, and LEQ raw points must be scaled because the sections have different exam weights. The second mistake is over-scoring DBQs and LEQs. Students often give themselves points for vague context or evidence that would not satisfy the rubric. The third mistake is treating the predicted score as certain. No calculator can guarantee an official AP score.

The fourth mistake is ignoring section balance. A strong MCQ score can be weakened by poor writing, and strong writing can be limited by low MCQ performance. The fifth mistake is focusing only on memorization. APUSH requires historical reasoning. The safest path is balanced preparation: period review, source analysis, short-answer practice, DBQ writing, and LEQ writing.

Recommended review workflow

Start with a timed diagnostic. Complete a full MCQ section or a representative source-based set, then complete SAQs, a DBQ, and an LEQ under timed conditions. Score your writing with rubrics. Enter the numbers into the calculator. Identify the weaker section. Then choose one focus for the week. If MCQs are weak, practice source sets and timeline review. If writing is weak, practice one rubric category at a time.

Keep a score log. Record the date, MCQ score, SAQ score, DBQ score, LEQ score, composite, predicted AP score, and main reason for missed points. After several practice rounds, patterns will appear. You may find that you lose points on Period 5 evidence, Period 7 source interpretation, DBQ sourcing, LEQ complexity, or SAQ specificity. Use those patterns to guide review. Focused correction beats random rereading.

Resources

Frequently asked questions

AP® and College Board are registered trademarks of the College Board, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse this calculator. This tool is for educational estimation and study planning only. It is not an official AP score report and does not guarantee college credit or placement.