AP Score Calculator

AP US History Score Calculator – APUSH Raw Score to AP Grade Converter

6 months ago
Last Update on October 19, 2025
12 mins
274 Views
Free APUSH score calculator. Convert raw multiple-choice, SAQ, DBQ, and LEQ scores to final AP grade (1-5). Based on official College Board scoring with accurate composite calculations and rubric breakdowns.

AP US History Score Calculator - APUSH Raw Score to AP Grade Converter

Comprehensive AP US History (APUSH) score calculator to convert raw multiple-choice, SAQ, DBQ, and LEQ scores into final AP grades (1-5). Based on official College Board scoring guidelines with accurate composite score calculations and detailed performance analysis.

AP US History Score Calculator

Section I: Multiple Choice

Multiple Choice Score: 0 / 55 Raw Points: 0.00

Section I: Short Answer Questions (SAQs)

Total SAQ Score: 0 / 12 Weighted: 0.00

Section II: Document-Based Question (DBQ)

DBQ Score: 0 / 7 Weighted: 0.00

Section II: Long Essay Question (LEQ)

LEQ Score: 0 / 6 Weighted: 0.00

Understanding AP US History Scoring

AP US History (APUSH) uses a comprehensive scoring system evaluating both content knowledge and historical thinking skills. The exam consists of Section I (multiple-choice and short answer questions) weighted at 60% and Section II (document-based question and long essay) weighted at 40%. Understanding how raw scores convert to the final 1-5 scale helps students set realistic goals and track progress during exam preparation.

APUSH Score Calculation Formula

Section I Score Calculation

Multiple Choice Component (40%):

\[ \text{MC Points} = \frac{\text{Number Correct}}{55} \times 40 \]

55 questions contribute 40% of total exam score

Short Answer Component (20%):

\[ \text{SAQ Points} = \frac{\text{Total SAQ Points}}{12} \times 20 \]

4 SAQs × 3 points = 12 points, weighted to 20% of exam

Section II Score Calculation

Document-Based Question (25%):

\[ \text{DBQ Points} = \frac{\text{DBQ Score}}{7} \times 25 \]

7-point DBQ rubric, weighted to 25% of exam

Long Essay Question (15%):

\[ \text{LEQ Points} = \frac{\text{LEQ Score}}{6} \times 15 \]

6-point LEQ rubric, weighted to 15% of exam

Composite Score

Final composite score combines all weighted components:

\[ \text{Composite} = \text{MC} + \text{SAQ} + \text{DBQ} + \text{LEQ} \]

Maximum possible: 40 + 20 + 25 + 15 = 100 points

This composite score converts to AP score (1-5) using College Board's conversion scale.

AP US History Score Conversion Table

Composite Score RangeAP ScoreDescriptionCollege Credit% of Students
75-1005Extremely Well QualifiedUsually grants credit~11%
65-744Well QualifiedOften grants credit~16%
50-643QualifiedSometimes grants credit~22%
35-492Possibly QualifiedRarely grants credit~22%
0-341No RecommendationNo credit~29%

Exam Structure & Time Distribution

SectionQuestion TypeQuestionsTimeWeight
Section I (60%)Multiple Choice55 questions55 minutes40%
Short Answer (SAQ)4 questions50 minutes20%
Section II (40%)Document-Based Question (DBQ)1 question60 minutes25%
Long Essay Question (LEQ)1 of 3 prompts40 minutes15%
Total Exam Time3 hours 15 minutes100%

What Score Do You Need?

Target AP ScoreMinimum CompositeMC Correct (~)Essay PerformancePercentage
5~75/10042-45/55 (76-82%)Strong essays (5+ DBQ, 4+ LEQ)75%
4~65/10036-40/55 (65-73%)Good essays (4+ DBQ, 3-4 LEQ)65%
3~50/10028-32/55 (51-58%)Adequate essays (3-4 DBQ, 2-3 LEQ)50%
2~35/10020-24/55 (36-44%)Weak essays (2-3 DBQ, 2 LEQ)35%

APUSH Rubric Breakdown

DBQ Rubric (7 Points Total)

CategoryPointsRequirements
Thesis/Claim1Historically defensible thesis responding to prompt
Contextualization1Broader historical context relevant to prompt
Evidence from Documents2Use at least 3 documents to support argument (1 pt); explain how 6 documents support (2 pts)
Evidence Beyond Documents1Use specific historical evidence beyond the documents
Analysis & Reasoning2Sourcing/POV analysis (1 pt); Complex understanding (1 pt)

LEQ Rubric (6 Points Total)

CategoryPointsRequirements
Thesis/Claim1Historically defensible thesis responding to prompt
Contextualization1Broader historical context relevant to prompt
Evidence22-3 specific examples (1 pt); explain how evidence supports argument (2 pts)
Analysis & Reasoning2Use historical reasoning skill (1 pt); Complex understanding (1 pt)

Worked Examples

Example 1: High Scoring Student (Target: 5)

Multiple Choice: 44/55 correct = 32.0 weighted points (80%)

SAQs: 2.5, 2.5, 3, 2.5 = 10.5/12 = 17.5 weighted points (88%)

DBQ: 6/7 = 21.4 weighted points (86%)

LEQ: 5/6 = 12.5 weighted points (83%)

Composite Score: 32.0 + 17.5 + 21.4 + 12.5 = 83.4

Final AP Score: 5 (Extremely Well Qualified)

Analysis: Strong performance across all sections, particularly essays

Example 2: Solid Student (Target: 4)

Multiple Choice: 37/55 correct = 26.9 weighted points (67%)

SAQs: 2, 2.5, 2, 2.5 = 9/12 = 15.0 weighted points (75%)

DBQ: 5/7 = 17.9 weighted points (71%)

LEQ: 4/6 = 10.0 weighted points (67%)

Composite Score: 26.9 + 15.0 + 17.9 + 10.0 = 69.8

Final AP Score: 4 (Well Qualified)

AP US History Content Periods

PeriodYearsExam WeightKey Themes
Period 11491-16074-6%Pre-Columbian, European exploration, colonization beginnings
Period 21607-17546-8%Colonial development, British-French rivalry
Period 31754-180010-17%Revolution, Constitution, early republic
Period 41800-184810-17%Jeffersonian democracy, Market Revolution, Manifest Destiny
Period 51844-187710-17%Civil War, Reconstruction
Period 61865-189810-17%Industrialization, Gilded Age, Populism
Period 71890-194510-17%Progressive Era, World Wars, New Deal
Period 81945-198010-17%Cold War, Civil Rights, Great Society
Period 91980-Present4-6%Conservative resurgence, globalization

Common Misconceptions

Memorizing Facts Alone Won't Earn High Scores

Many APUSH students focus exclusively on memorizing dates, names, and events, believing content knowledge alone guarantees success. However, APUSH emphasizes historical thinking skills: causation, comparison, continuity and change over time, and contextualization. Essays scoring 6-7 points demonstrate sophisticated analysis, not just fact recitation. Students who memorize effectively but can't analyze relationships, evaluate significance, or construct arguments typically score 2-3 range. Balance content mastery with skill development—practice writing theses, using evidence argumentatively, and explaining historical significance.

You Don't Need All 7 Documents for Full DBQ Credit

Students often believe they must use all provided documents to score well on the DBQ. The rubric requires using evidence from at least 6 documents for 2 points (3 documents = 1 point). Using all 7+ documents doesn't automatically earn extra credit—quality matters more than quantity. Focus on explaining HOW documents support your argument and analyzing sourcing/POV for 3-4 documents. A DBQ using 6 documents effectively with strong analysis outscores one mechanically listing all documents without depth. Strategic document selection supporting a clear thesis trumps comprehensive but shallow coverage.

Period 9 (1980-Present) Still Appears on the Exam

Some students neglect recent history, assuming the exam focuses primarily on earlier periods. While Period 9 represents only 4-6% exam weight, questions absolutely appear in multiple-choice, SAQs, and essay options. More importantly, recent history provides crucial context for earlier periods—understanding Reagan-era conservatism illuminates Progressive Era reforms through comparison. LEQ prompts often span multiple periods, requiring Period 9 knowledge for complete answers. The "recency effect" also means contemporary topics (civil rights, Cold War, globalization) frequently appear as connecting threads across questions. Study all nine periods thoroughly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What percentage do you need for a 5 on APUSH?

You typically need approximately 75% of total possible points to earn a 5 on AP US History. This translates to a composite score around 75 out of 100 points. In practical terms, you could answer 42-45 multiple-choice questions correctly (out of 55) while scoring 5+ on the DBQ and 4+ on the LEQ to achieve a 5. Only about 11% of APUSH students earn 5s, making it one of the more challenging AP History exams. The exact cutoff varies annually as College Board adjusts for exam difficulty, but 75% is a reliable target for top performance.

Is APUSH harder than AP World History?

APUSH and AP World History test similar skills but differ in scope and depth. APUSH covers 500+ years of US history in detail, requiring deep knowledge of specific events, people, and documents. AP World spans 10,000+ years globally, emphasizing broader patterns and comparative analysis. Success rates vary: APUSH typically has 11% earning 5s versus AP World's 10%, suggesting comparable difficulty. Students with strong US history backgrounds often find APUSH manageable; those preferring big-picture thinking may prefer World. APUSH demands more memorization of specific details; World requires managing vast geographic and temporal scope. Choose based on interests and strengths, not perceived difficulty.

How is APUSH different from regular US History?

APUSH differs fundamentally from standard US History courses in scope, rigor, and expectations. Regular US History typically surveys American history chronologically with emphasis on narrative and basic comprehension. APUSH requires college-level historical thinking: analyzing primary sources, constructing sophisticated arguments, evaluating historical interpretations, and writing analytical essays. The pace is faster—covering 9 periods in one year versus 2-3 in regular courses. APUSH emphasizes thematic connections across time periods using the College Board's themes (American Identity, Politics, Work/Exchange, etc.). Assessment focuses on skills (DBQ, LEQ, document analysis) rather than multiple-choice recall. Students should expect 30+ minutes homework nightly and significant reading loads.

Can you get a 0 on the DBQ or LEQ and still pass?

Theoretically yes, but practically very unlikely. The DBQ represents 25% and LEQ 15% of your total score. Scoring 0 on both means losing 40% of possible points, requiring near-perfect performance elsewhere. To pass (score 3 = 50 composite points), you'd need approximately 50/60 points from Section I—meaning 48-50/55 multiple-choice (87-91%) AND 11-12/12 SAQ points (92-100%). This level of perfection on Section I is extremely rare. More realistically, even weak essays (2-3 points DBQ, 1-2 LEQ) combined with strong Section I performance (75-80%) can earn a 3. Always attempt essays—partial credit from thesis, contextualization, or basic evidence can salvage passable scores.

How long should I spend on the DBQ versus LEQ?

The exam allocates 60 minutes for DBQ (including 15-minute reading period) and 40 minutes for LEQ. These timings reflect their relative weights: DBQ (25%) versus LEQ (15%). Effective time management: use the full 15-minute reading period to analyze documents, plan thesis, and outline; write DBQ for ~40-45 minutes; allocate full 40 minutes for LEQ with ~5 minutes planning. Many students under-allocate LEQ time, producing rushed essays that lose complexity points. While DBQ is worth more, LEQ still represents 15%—a poorly written LEQ (scoring 2/6) versus solid one (5/6) costs ~7.5 composite points, potentially dropping you from 4 to 3. Balance emphasis appropriately.

Do I lose points for wrong answers on multiple-choice?

No, AP US History uses rights-only scoring for multiple-choice—you earn 1 point per correct answer, 0 points for incorrect or blank responses. There's no guessing penalty, so you should ALWAYS answer every multiple-choice question even if you're completely guessing. Statistically, random guessing on 10 questions yields ~2 correct answers, adding ~1.5 composite points. Strategic elimination of wrong answers improves odds further. Never leave blanks. This differs from older SAT scoring (which penalized guessing) but matches all current AP exams. Focus energy on eliminating obviously wrong answers and making educated guesses rather than agonizing over uncertainty.

Score Improvement Strategies

Maximize your APUSH score with these proven strategies:

  • Master the rubrics: Know exactly what earns points on DBQ and LEQ—study released scoring guidelines
  • Practice thesis writing: Clear, defensible theses are crucial for essay success
  • Use specific evidence: General statements don't earn evidence points—name specific people, events, dates
  • Contextualize effectively: Connect your topic to broader historical trends for easy points
  • Analyze documents actively: Don't just summarize—explain HOW documents support your argument
  • Time management: Practice full-length exams under timed conditions regularly
  • Review mistakes: Analyze why you missed MC questions to identify content gaps
  • Connect periods: Think thematically across time periods for sophisticated comparisons

About This Calculator

Developed by RevisionTown

RevisionTown provides comprehensive AP exam resources for all AP subjects. Our AP US History score calculator uses official College Board scoring methodology and rubrics to deliver accurate score predictions for APUSH students and teachers.

Whether you're an APUSH student analyzing practice test performance, a teacher helping students understand scoring, or comparing different AP History options, our calculator provides precise conversions with complete educational context.

APUSH Resources: Explore our complete APUSH study guides covering all 9 periods, DBQ and LEQ writing tutorials, document analysis practice, SAQ strategies, period review sheets, thematic connections guides, and college credit policy comparisons.

Important Disclaimer

This calculator provides estimated AP US History scores based on typical College Board conversion scales from recent exams. Actual score conversions vary by exam year as College Board adjusts for difficulty through equating processes. Composite score cutoffs for each AP grade (1-5) can shift ±3-5 points between administrations. Essay scoring is subjective—rubric application varies among readers, though College Board training ensures consistency. This tool is for educational planning and practice test analysis—official AP scores are determined solely by College Board-trained readers and the scoring process. Use this calculator for study guidance and goal-setting, understanding that actual exam results may differ. For official scoring information, rubrics, and current conversion guidelines, consult College Board's AP Central website. This calculator does not replace official College Board scoring or guarantee any specific exam outcome.

AP US Government & Politics – 2025 Complete Cheatsheet

🏛 Unit 1: Foundations of American Democracy ▼
  • Enlightenment Ideas & Foundations
    • Natural Rights Philosophy - John Locke's theory that individuals possess inherent rights to life, liberty, and property that cannot be surrendered to government
    • Social Contract Theory - People voluntarily consent to be governed in exchange for protection of their rights; government legitimacy derives from consent of the governed
    • Popular Sovereignty - The principle that government's authority comes from the people, who are the ultimate source of political power
    • Limited Government - Restrictions on governmental power to prevent tyranny and protect individual freedoms
  • The Declaration of Independence (1776)
    • Drafted primarily by Thomas Jefferson, influenced by Enlightenment philosophers
    • Established foundational principles: "all men are created equal," unalienable rights to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"
    • Listed grievances against King George III to justify separation from Britain
    • Proclaimed the right of revolution when government violates natural rights
    • Key phrase: "Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"
  • The Articles of Confederation (1781-1789)
    • America's first constitution creating a "league of friendship" among states
    • Weaknesses: No executive branch, no national judiciary, no power to tax, no power to regulate interstate commerce, required unanimous consent to amend, each state had one vote regardless of population
    • Shay's Rebellion (1786-1787) - Armed uprising of Massachusetts farmers exposed the government's inability to maintain order, catalyzed calls for constitutional convention
    • Demonstrated that too weak a central government leads to instability and inability to address national problems
  • Models of Representative Democracy
    • Participatory Democracy - Emphasizes broad citizen participation in politics and civil society; direct involvement in decision-making processes; strong civil engagement and grassroots movements
    • Pluralist Democracy - Competition among diverse interest groups shapes public policy; no single group dominates; government acts as mediator among competing factions; examples include lobbying groups, PACs, advocacy organizations
    • Elite Democracy - Political power concentrated among educated, wealthy elites who are better equipped to make policy decisions; limited mass participation; expertise-driven governance
  • Constitutional Principles
    • Federalism - Division of power between national and state governments; dual sovereignty; each level has distinct powers (enumerated vs. reserved)
    • Separation of Powers - Division of government into three branches (Legislative, Executive, Judicial) with distinct functions to prevent concentration of power
    • Checks and Balances - Each branch has mechanisms to limit the powers of the other two branches
      • Legislative checks: Override vetoes (2/3 vote), Senate confirms appointments, impeachment power, controls budget
      • Executive checks: Veto legislation, nominates judges, executive orders, pardon power
      • Judicial checks: Judicial review, declares laws/actions unconstitutional, lifetime appointments ensure independence
    • Federalist No. 51 by Madison - "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition" - explains how separation of powers and checks and balances protect against tyranny
  • The Constitutional Convention (1787)
    • The Virginia Plan - Proposed bicameral legislature with representation based on population; favored large states
    • The New Jersey Plan - Proposed unicameral legislature with equal state representation; favored small states
    • The Great Compromise (Connecticut Compromise) - Created bicameral legislature: House based on population, Senate with equal representation (2 per state); resolved large state vs. small state debate
    • Three-Fifths Compromise - Counted enslaved persons as 3/5 of a person for representation and taxation purposes; increased Southern power in House and Electoral College
    • Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise - Congress could not ban slave trade until 1808; gave federal government power to regulate interstate commerce
  • The Electoral College
    • Compromise between popular vote and congressional selection of president
    • Each state gets electors equal to its total congressional delegation (House + Senate)
    • Total of 538 electors; 270 needed to win
    • Most states use winner-take-all system (Maine and Nebraska use district method)
    • If no candidate reaches 270, House elects president (each state delegation gets one vote)
    • Criticisms: Winner of popular vote can lose election; gives disproportionate power to swing states; discourages turnout in non-competitive states
  • Ratification Debate
    • Federalists - Supported ratification (Hamilton, Madison, Jay); argued for strong central government; wrote Federalist Papers to promote Constitution
    • Anti-Federalists - Opposed ratification (Patrick Henry, George Mason); feared tyranny of strong central government; demanded Bill of Rights as condition for ratification; wrote Brutus essays
    • Federalist No. 10 - Madison argues that a large republic better controls factions than small democracy; diversity of interests prevents tyranny of majority
    • Constitution ratified in 1788; Bill of Rights added in 1791 as compromise to secure ratification
⚖️ Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government ▼
  • The Legislative Branch - Congress
    • Structure: Bicameral legislature consisting of House of Representatives (435 members, 2-year terms) and Senate (100 members, 6-year terms with staggered elections)
    • House of Representatives
      • Representation based on state population (reapportioned every 10 years after census)
      • Must be 25 years old, citizen for 7 years, resident of state
      • Speaker of the House - Most powerful position; controls floor agenda, assigns bills to committees
      • Exclusive powers: Initiate revenue bills, impeach federal officials, elect president if Electoral College fails
    • Senate
      • Equal representation (2 senators per state regardless of population)
      • Must be 30 years old, citizen for 9 years, resident of state
      • President Pro Tempore - Presides in Vice President's absence (largely ceremonial)
      • Exclusive powers: Confirm presidential appointments (simple majority), ratify treaties (2/3 vote), try impeachment cases, elect VP if Electoral College fails
  • Congressional Powers
    • Enumerated Powers (Article I, Section 8): Tax and spend, borrow money, regulate interstate and foreign commerce, coin money, establish post offices, declare war, raise armies, establish federal courts below Supreme Court
    • Implied Powers: "Necessary and proper clause" (elastic clause) - Congress can make laws needed to execute enumerated powers; established in McCulloch v. Maryland
    • Power of the Purse - Congress controls federal spending through budget and appropriations; most significant check on executive branch
    • Oversight Function - Monitor executive branch implementation of laws through hearings, investigations, GAO audits
  • Legislative Process
    • Committee System - Standing committees (permanent, subject-specific), select committees (temporary, specific purpose), joint committees (both chambers), conference committees (reconcile House/Senate versions)
    • Bill becomes law: Introduction → Committee review → Floor debate → Vote → Other chamber repeats process → Conference committee if needed → Presidential action (sign, veto, or pocket veto)
    • Simple Majority - 50% + 1 vote; used for most legislation, presidential appointments
    • Supermajority Requirements:
      • 2/3 vote to override presidential veto
      • 2/3 vote to ratify treaties (Senate only)
      • 2/3 vote to propose constitutional amendments
      • 3/5 vote for cloture to end filibuster (Senate only)
  • Senate Unique Procedures
    • Filibuster - Tactic to delay or block legislation through unlimited debate; senator can speak indefinitely to prevent vote
    • Cloture - Requires 60 votes (3/5 of Senate) to end filibuster and force vote on legislation
    • Hold - Senator can anonymously block floor consideration of bill or nomination
    • Unanimous Consent - Agreements to expedite Senate business; any senator can object
  • Congressional Influences and Practices
    • Pork-Barrel Spending - Appropriations securing federal funds for local projects to benefit constituents and boost reelection chances
    • Logrolling - Trading votes between legislators; "I'll vote for your bill if you vote for mine"
    • Earmarks - Provisions inserted into bills to direct funds to specific projects in member's district (banned 2011-2021, now with disclosure requirements)
    • Trustee Model - Representatives vote based on their own judgment of what's best
    • Delegate Model - Representatives vote according to constituent preferences
    • Politico Model - Representatives balance trustee and delegate approaches situationally
  • The Executive Branch - President
    • Formal Requirements: Natural-born citizen, 35 years old, 14-year resident; 4-year term, limited to 2 terms (22nd Amendment)
    • Enumerated Powers (Article II):
      • Commander-in-Chief - Control of military; War Powers Resolution (1973) requires congressional notification within 48 hours, authorization within 60 days
      • Chief Diplomat - Negotiate treaties (require 2/3 Senate approval), make executive agreements (no Senate approval needed), receive foreign ambassadors
      • Chief Executive - "Take care that laws be faithfully executed," appoint cabinet members and agency heads
      • Chief Legislator - Veto legislation, recommend legislation via State of the Union, call special congressional sessions
      • Appointment Power - Nominate federal judges, cabinet members, ambassadors (Senate confirmation required)
      • Pardon Power - Grant reprieves and pardons for federal crimes (except impeachment)
  • Presidential Powers Expansion
    • Executive Orders - Directives with force of law; manage federal government operations; subject to judicial review; can be overturned by Congress or future presidents
    • Executive Agreements - International agreements not requiring Senate approval; same legal force as treaties domestically
    • Signing Statements - Written declarations by president when signing bills; express interpretation or concerns about constitutionality
    • Executive Privilege - Right to withhold information from Congress/courts; not absolute; limited by United States v. Nixon
    • Bully Pulpit - President's ability to use office visibility to promote agenda and shape public opinion
  • Presidential Roles
    • Chief of State - Ceremonial head representing nation; symbolic leadership
    • Chief Executive - Runs federal bureaucracy; appoints officials; issues executive orders
    • Chief Diplomat - Conducts foreign policy; negotiates treaties; recognizes nations
    • Commander-in-Chief - Controls armed forces; makes military decisions
    • Chief Legislator - Shapes legislative agenda; signs/vetoes bills; delivers State of Union
    • Chief of Party - Leads political party; campaigns for party members; shapes party platform
    • Chief Citizen - Represents all Americans; moral leadership; responds to national crises
  • The Judicial Branch - Federal Courts
    • Structure: Supreme Court (9 justices), Courts of Appeals (13 circuits), District Courts (94 districts), specialized courts
    • Supreme Court (SCOTUS)
      • Composition: Chief Justice + 8 Associate Justices; lifetime appointments (good behavior)
      • Jurisdiction: Original (cases involving states, diplomats) and Appellate (reviews lower court decisions)
      • Certiorari - "Rule of Four": 4 justices must agree to hear case; SCOTUS accepts <100 of ~7,000 annual petitions
    • Judicial Review - Power to declare laws and executive actions unconstitutional; established in Marbury v. Madison (1803); most significant check on other branches
    • Judicial Philosophies
      • Judicial Activism - Courts should play active role in shaping social policy; broader interpretation of Constitution
      • Judicial Restraint - Courts should defer to legislative/executive branches; strict interpretation; avoid policy-making
      • Originalism - Interpret Constitution based on original intent of framers
      • Living Constitution - Constitution adapts to changing times and modern circumstances
  • Judicial Independence and Accountability
    • Protections: Lifetime tenure (good behavior), salary cannot be decreased, appointment rather than election
    • Constraints: Congress controls budget, size of courts, jurisdiction; Senate confirms appointments; constitutional amendments can override decisions; enforcement depends on executive branch
    • Impeachment: Judges can be impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors" but rarely happens
  • The Bureaucracy
    • Structure: 15 Cabinet departments (State, Treasury, Defense, etc.), independent executive agencies (EPA, NASA), independent regulatory commissions (FCC, SEC, FTC)
    • Functions: Implementation (execute laws), regulation (create/enforce rules), administration (manage programs)
    • Rulemaking - Federal agencies create specific regulations to implement laws; have force of law; subject to notice-and-comment period
    • Iron Triangles - Close relationships between congressional committees, bureaucratic agencies, and interest groups; coordinate policy in specific areas
    • Issue Networks - Broader, looser coalitions of stakeholders influencing policy; more fluid than iron triangles
    • Congressional Oversight: Hearings, investigations, power of purse, Senate confirmations, GAO audits
👥 Unit 3: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights ▼
  • Civil Liberties vs. Civil Rights
    • Civil Liberties - Constitutional protections against government infringement; freedoms government cannot take away (speech, religion, privacy)
    • Civil Rights - Constitutional guarantees of equal treatment under law; protections from discrimination; government obligation to ensure equality
  • The Bill of Rights (First 10 Amendments)
    • Added in 1791 as compromise to secure ratification; originally applied only to federal government
    • Selective Incorporation - Process of applying Bill of Rights to states through 14th Amendment Due Process Clause; occurred case-by-case throughout 20th century
    • Most Bill of Rights protections now apply to states except: 3rd Amendment (quartering soldiers), 5th Amendment grand jury requirement, 7th Amendment civil jury trials, 8th Amendment excessive fines
  • First Amendment - Freedom of Religion
    • Establishment Clause - "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"
      • Lemon Test (Lemon v. Kurtzman, 1971): Government action must have secular purpose, neither advance nor inhibit religion, not create excessive entanglement
      • Prohibits school-sponsored prayer (Engel v. Vitale, 1962)
      • Allows some religious displays on public property if secular purpose
    • Free Exercise Clause - "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
      • Government cannot punish religious beliefs
      • Religious practices can be limited if compelling state interest (Employment Division v. Smith, 1990)
      • Religious Freedom Restoration Act (1993) provides additional protections
      • Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) - Amish exempted from compulsory education laws
  • First Amendment - Freedom of Speech
    • Protected Speech: Political speech (most protected), symbolic speech (flag burning, armbands), commercial speech (advertising - less protection)
    • Unprotected Speech: Obscenity (Miller test), fighting words, defamation (libel/slander), incitement to imminent lawless action, true threats
    • Key Cases:
      • Schenck v. United States (1919) - "Clear and present danger" test; speech can be limited during wartime
      • Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) - Students don't "shed rights at schoolhouse gate"; symbolic speech protected unless substantial disruption
      • Texas v. Johnson (1989) - Flag burning protected as symbolic speech
      • Citizens United v. FEC (2010) - Corporate political spending protected as free speech
    • Prior Restraint - Government censorship before publication; presumed unconstitutional (New York Times v. United States, 1971 - Pentagon Papers)
  • First Amendment - Freedom of Press and Assembly
    • Freedom of Press: Shield laws (protect journalist sources), no prior restraint, press can publish leaked information
    • Libel/Slander: Public figures must prove "actual malice" (knowingly false or reckless disregard for truth) - New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)
    • Freedom of Assembly: Right to peaceful protest; government can impose time/place/manner restrictions if content-neutral
    • Right to Petition: Citizens can appeal to government for redress of grievances
  • Second Amendment - Right to Bear Arms
    • "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
    • District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) - Individual right to possess firearms for self-defense in federal enclaves
    • McDonald v. Chicago (2010) - Incorporated 2nd Amendment to states via 14th Amendment
    • Government can impose reasonable regulations: prohibit felons/mentally ill from possessing guns, ban certain weapons, regulate commercial sales
  • Rights of the Accused (4th, 5th, 6th, 8th Amendments)
    • 4th Amendment - Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures; requires warrants based on probable cause
      • Exclusionary Rule - Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in court (Mapp v. Ohio, 1961)
      • Exceptions: consent searches, plain view, stop and frisk, automobile exception, exigent circumstances
    • 5th Amendment - Right against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, due process; requires grand jury indictment for serious federal crimes; takings clause (eminent domain with just compensation)
    • 6th Amendment - Right to speedy and public trial, impartial jury, confront witnesses, compel witnesses, counsel
      • Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) - Right to attorney in felony cases for indigent defendants
    • 8th Amendment - No excessive bail or fines, no cruel and unusual punishment
      • Death penalty constitutional but subject to restrictions
      • Proportionality requirement for sentences
    • Miranda Rights (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966) - Police must inform suspects of rights before custodial interrogation: right to remain silent, statements can be used against you, right to attorney, attorney provided if cannot afford
  • Right to Privacy
    • Not explicitly in Constitution; derived from "penumbras" of other amendments
    • Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) - Established privacy right; struck down ban on contraceptives for married couples
    • Roe v. Wade (1973) - Extended privacy right to abortion; trimester framework; overturned by Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022)
    • Lawrence v. Texas (2003) - Privacy protects consensual sexual conduct; struck down sodomy laws
  • Civil Rights - 14th Amendment
    • Equal Protection Clause - "No state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws"
      • Strict Scrutiny - Applied to classifications based on race, national origin, religion; government must show compelling interest and narrowly tailored means
      • Intermediate Scrutiny - Applied to gender classifications; government must show important interest and substantially related means
      • Rational Basis - Applied to most other classifications; government must show legitimate interest and rational relationship
    • Due Process Clause - Prohibits states from depriving persons of life, liberty, or property without due process; basis for selective incorporation
  • Racial Discrimination and Civil Rights Movement
    • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) - "Separate but equal" doctrine upheld racial segregation
    • Brown v. Board of Education (1954) - Overturned Plessy; declared school segregation unconstitutional; "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal"
    • Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Prohibited discrimination in public accommodations, employment, federally funded programs; Title VII created EEOC
    • Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Banned literacy tests, provided federal oversight of elections in jurisdictions with history of discrimination; Section 5 preclearance struck down in Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
    • Affirmative Action - Policies to increase opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups
      • Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978) - Racial quotas unconstitutional but race can be one factor
      • Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) - Diversity is compelling interest; narrowly tailored race-conscious admissions permitted
      • Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard/UNC (2023) - Struck down race-conscious admissions policies
  • Gender Discrimination
    • 19th Amendment (1920) - Women's suffrage
    • Title VII of Civil Rights Act (1964) - Prohibited employment discrimination based on sex
    • Title IX of Education Amendments (1972) - Prohibited sex discrimination in education
    • Reed v. Reed (1971) - First case striking down law based on gender discrimination
    • Craig v. Boren (1976) - Established intermediate scrutiny for gender classifications
    • United States v. Virginia (1996) - VMI must admit women; state cannot exclude based solely on gender
  • Other Protected Groups
    • Age Discrimination: Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1967) - protects workers 40+
    • Disability Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) - requires reasonable accommodations, prohibits discrimination
    • LGBTQ+ Rights:
      • Romer v. Evans (1996) - Struck down anti-LGBTQ discrimination law
      • Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) - Same-sex marriage constitutional right
      • Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) - Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity
🗽 Unit 4: American Political Ideologies and Beliefs ▼
  • Political Socialization
    • Process by which individuals develop political values, beliefs, attitudes, and ideologies
    • Agents of Socialization:
      • Family - Most influential; transmits party identification, values, civic engagement levels
      • Schools - Civic education, patriotic rituals, exposure to diverse viewpoints
      • Peers - Reinforcement and challenge of beliefs; social pressure
      • Media - Information source, agenda-setting, framing of issues
      • Religious Institutions - Moral values, political engagement, issue positions
      • Life Events - Wars, economic crises, social movements shape political views
    • Generational Effects - Shared experiences of age cohorts create distinct political orientations (Greatest Generation, Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, Gen Z)
  • Core American Values
    • Liberty - Freedom from government interference; individual autonomy
    • Equality - Equal opportunity, political equality, debate over equality of outcome
    • Individualism - Self-reliance, personal responsibility, limited government
    • Democracy - Popular sovereignty, majority rule with minority rights
    • Rule of Law - Laws apply equally to all; government bound by law
    • Free Enterprise - Market economy, private property, economic competition
  • Public Opinion
    • Collective attitudes of citizens on government, policies, and politics
    • Measuring Public Opinion - Polling:
      • Scientific Polling - Random sampling, representative sample, margin of error (typically ±3-4% for national polls)
      • Sampling Error - Difference between sample results and true population values; decreases with larger sample size
      • Question Wording - Phrasing affects responses; leading questions bias results
      • Question Order - Earlier questions can influence later responses
      • Sample Selection - Likely voters vs. registered voters vs. all adults; affects results
    • Types of Polls:
      • Benchmark Polls - Initial poll in campaign to assess candidate's standing
      • Tracking Polls - Continuous polling over time to detect trends
      • Exit Polls - Surveys of voters leaving polling places; predict winners, analyze voter behavior
      • Push Polls - Not true polls; attempt to influence voters through loaded questions
    • Challenges: Nonresponse bias, social desirability bias, difficulty reaching representative samples (cell phones, declining response rates)
  • Political Ideologies
    • Liberalism (Left/Progressive)
      • Economic: Support government intervention/regulation of economy, progressive taxation, social welfare programs, labor protections, minimum wage increases
      • Social: Expand civil liberties and rights, support LGBTQ+ rights, abortion rights, criminal justice reform, environmental protection, gun control
      • Role of Government: Active government role in addressing social/economic problems; safety net programs
      • Emphasize equality, social justice, collective responsibility
    • Conservatism (Right)
      • Economic: Free market capitalism, limited regulation, lower taxes, reduced government spending, fiscal responsibility, oppose large welfare programs
      • Social: Traditional values, strong national defense, tough on crime, restrict abortion, Second Amendment rights, school choice
      • Role of Government: Limited government except national security; states' rights; individual responsibility over government programs
      • Emphasize liberty, traditional values, individual responsibility
    • Libertarianism
      • Maximum individual freedom in both economic and social realms
      • Minimal government intervention beyond protection of property rights and personal safety
      • Oppose both economic regulations and social regulations
      • Support free markets, civil liberties, non-interventionist foreign policy
    • Moderates/Centrists
      • Hold mixture of liberal and conservative views
      • May be liberal on some issues, conservative on others
      • Often pragmatic; support compromise solutions
  • Political Parties
    • Democratic Party
      • Generally aligned with liberal ideology
      • Coalition includes urban voters, minorities, young voters, educated professionals, unions
      • Support: social welfare programs, environmental regulation, gun control, abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, progressive taxation
    • Republican Party
      • Generally aligned with conservative ideology
      • Coalition includes rural voters, white evangelicals, business owners, older voters, military veterans
      • Support: limited government, free markets, strong military, traditional values, gun rights, school choice, restrict abortion
    • Third Parties: Libertarian, Green, others; rarely win major offices but can influence debate and elections (spoiler effect)
  • Economic Policy Views
    • Fiscal Policy - Government taxing and spending
      • Keynesian Economics (Liberal view) - Government should increase spending during recessions to stimulate economy
      • Supply-Side Economics (Conservative view) - Lower taxes stimulate economic growth by increasing investment and production
    • Monetary Policy - Federal Reserve control of money supply and interest rates; generally less partisan than fiscal policy
    • Trade Policy - Free trade vs. protectionism; traditional divisions less clear in recent years
    • Entitlements - Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid; debate over sustainability and reform
  • Social Policy Views
    • Education: School choice, charter schools, standardized testing, student loans, affirmative action
    • Healthcare: Universal healthcare vs. market-based; role of government; Affordable Care Act debates
    • Criminal Justice: Tough on crime vs. reform; death penalty; mandatory minimum sentences; police reform
    • Immigration: Border security, pathway to citizenship, DACA, refugee policy
    • Environment: Climate change policy, regulations vs. market solutions, energy policy
  • Foreign Policy Views
    • Interventionism - Active U.S. role in world affairs; military intervention to promote democracy/human rights
    • Isolationism - Limited involvement in foreign conflicts; focus on domestic priorities
    • Multilateralism - Work through international organizations and alliances (UN, NATO)
    • Unilateralism - Act independently based on national interest
🗳 Unit 5: Political Participation ▼
  • Forms of Political Participation
    • Voting - Most common form; turnout varies by election type (presidential > midterm > local)
    • Campaign Activities - Volunteering, donating money, attending rallies, displaying signs/stickers
    • Contacting Officials - Emails, calls, letters to representatives; constituent services
    • Protest and Demonstrations - Marches, rallies, civil disobedience to express grievances
    • Joining Organizations - Interest groups, political parties, civic associations
    • Social Media Activism - Online campaigns, petitions, spreading information
  • Voting Behavior Models
    • Rational Choice Voting - Voters choose candidates who best serve their individual interests; cost-benefit analysis
    • Retrospective Voting - Voters evaluate incumbent's past performance; reward or punish based on results
    • Prospective Voting - Voters choose based on candidates' promises and proposed policies for the future
    • Party-Line Voting - Voting for all candidates from same party; based on party loyalty/identification
  • Factors Influencing Voter Turnout
    • Demographic Factors:
      • Age - Older voters turnout at higher rates than younger voters
      • Education - More educated citizens vote at higher rates
      • Income - Higher income correlates with higher turnout
      • Race - White voters historically higher turnout; gaps narrowing
    • Legal Requirements:
      • Voter registration requirements (some states easier than others)
      • Voter ID laws (proponents: prevent fraud; opponents: suppress turnout)
      • Early voting and mail-in voting availability
      • Felon disenfranchisement laws (vary by state)
    • Political Factors:
      • Competitiveness of race (closer races increase turnout)
      • Candidate quality and mobilization efforts
      • Media coverage and campaign spending
    • Political Efficacy - Belief that one's participation matters; higher efficacy increases turnout
    • Civic Duty - Sense of obligation to participate; socialized belief in voting responsibility
  • Voter Registration and Expansion of Suffrage
    • 15th Amendment (1870) - Prohibited racial discrimination in voting (though circumvented by literacy tests, poll taxes, grandfather clauses)
    • 19th Amendment (1920) - Women's suffrage
    • Voting Rights Act (1965) - Banned literacy tests, provided federal oversight
    • 24th Amendment (1964) - Prohibited poll taxes in federal elections
    • 26th Amendment (1971) - Lowered voting age to 18
    • Motor Voter Act (1993) - Requires states to offer voter registration at DMV and other agencies
    • Help America Vote Act (2002) - Mandated improvements to voting systems after 2000 election controversies
  • Linkage Institutions
    • Connect citizens to government; channel public preferences into policy
      • Political Parties - Organize government, nominate candidates, mobilize voters, simplify choices
      • Elections - Mechanism for choosing representatives, expressing preferences, holding officials accountable
      • Interest Groups - Represent specific interests, lobby government, educate public
      • Media - Inform public, set agenda, watchdog function, platform for debate
  • Political Parties - Functions and Structure
    • Functions:
      • Nominate and recruit candidates
      • Mobilize and educate voters
      • Facilitate governance and coordinate policy
      • Provide loyal opposition and accountability
      • Simplify choices for voters (brand/label)
    • Structure:
      • National Level - National committees (DNC, RNC), national conventions every 4 years
      • State Level - State party organizations, state conventions
      • Local Level - County/city committees, precinct organizations
    • Party in Government: Elected officials who share party label; organize Congress
    • Party in Electorate: Citizens who identify with party
    • Party Organization: Formal party structure (committees, staff, conventions)
  • Presidential Elections - Nomination Process
    • Invisible Primary - Period before formal primaries; candidates raise money, build organizations, seek endorsements
    • Primaries - State elections to choose delegates for national convention
      • Open Primaries - Any registered voter can participate in either party's primary
      • Closed Primaries - Only registered party members can vote in that party's primary
      • Semi-Closed - Registered party members and independents can participate
    • Caucuses - Party meetings where members discuss and vote for candidates; more time-intensive than primaries; lower turnout
    • Delegates
      • Pledged Delegates - Allocated based on primary/caucus results
      • Superdelegates (Democrats) - Party leaders and elected officials with automatic delegate status; can support any candidate
    • National Convention - Formally nominates presidential and VP candidates; adopts party platform; unifies party
    • Front-Loading - States schedule primaries early to increase influence; criticisms: advantages well-funded candidates, reduces deliberation
  • General Election Campaign
    • Incumbent Advantage
      • Name recognition and established record
      • Fundraising advantages and donor networks
      • Constituency services and credit-claiming
      • Media access and "free" publicity from official duties
      • Experienced campaign staff and organization
    • Campaign Strategies:
      • Target swing states and swing voters
      • Mobilize base while appealing to moderates
      • Negative campaigning and opposition research
      • Debates and media appearances
      • Ground game (field offices, canvassing) vs. air war (TV ads)
  • Campaign Finance
    • Hard Money - Direct contributions to candidates/parties; strictly regulated and limited by FEC
    • Soft Money - Contributions to parties for "party-building" activities; banned for national parties by BCRA (2002)
    • Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA, 1971) - Required disclosure of contributions, created FEC, established contribution limits
    • Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA/McCain-Feingold, 2002) - Banned soft money to national parties, restricted electioneering communications
    • Citizens United v. FEC (2010) - Corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts on independent political expenditures; cannot donate directly to candidates
    • Super PACs - Independent expenditure-only committees; can raise/spend unlimited amounts; cannot coordinate with candidates
    • Dark Money - Political spending from nonprofit organizations that don't disclose donors (501(c)(4) "social welfare" groups)
    • Public Financing - Optional system for presidential campaigns; candidates receive federal funds if they limit spending; declining participation
  • Interest Groups
    • Types:
      • Economic Groups - Business associations, labor unions, professional associations (AMA, ABA)
      • Public Interest Groups - Advance causes benefiting broader public (ACLU, Sierra Club, Common Cause)
      • Single-Issue Groups - Focus on one specific issue (NRA, NARAL, Right to Life)
      • Ideological Groups - Promote broad ideological perspective (Heritage Foundation, Center for American Progress)
    • Tactics:
      • Lobbying - Direct contact with policymakers; provide information, draft legislation, testify at hearings
      • Electioneering - Campaign contributions through PACs, endorsements, voter mobilization
      • Litigation - File lawsuits, submit amicus briefs to influence judicial decisions
      • Grassroots Mobilization - Mobilize members to contact officials, organize protests
      • Public Education - Media campaigns, issue ads, research reports
    • Pluralist Theory - Competition among interest groups produces responsive government; diffusion of power prevents dominance by any single group
    • Criticisms: Wealthy interests have more influence, collective action problems disadvantage diffuse interests, iron triangles/regulatory capture
  • Media and Politics
    • Functions:
      • Agenda-Setting - Media influences which issues public/government considers important
      • Framing - How media presents issues shapes public understanding and opinion
      • Priming - Media coverage affects standards by which public evaluates politicians
      • Watchdog - Investigative journalism holds officials accountable
      • Forum - Provides platform for political debate and discourse
    • Changes in Media Landscape:
      • Decline of traditional media (newspapers, broadcast TV)
      • Rise of cable news (24-hour cycle, partisan channels)
      • Internet and social media (fragmentation, echo chambers, misinformation)
      • Decline of local news coverage
    • Media Bias: Accusations from both sides; structural bias toward conflict/horse race coverage; ideological bias varies by outlet; confirmation bias in consumption
    • Social Media Impact: Direct candidate-to-voter communication, viral spread of information/misinformation, micro-targeting, filter bubbles, polarization
📜 Required Foundational Documents ▼
  • DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE (1776)
    • Author: Thomas Jefferson (with edits by Committee of Five)
    • Context: American colonies declaring separation from Great Britain
    • Key Ideas:
      • Natural Rights Philosophy - "All men are created equal" with unalienable rights to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"
      • Social Contract - Governments derive "just powers from the consent of the governed"
      • Right of Revolution - When government violates rights, people have right/duty to alter or abolish it
      • List of Grievances - 27 specific complaints against King George III justifying separation
    • Significance: Established foundational American principles; influenced constitutions worldwide; equality principle used by later reform movements
    • Key Quote: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal..."
  • THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION (1781-1789)
    • Context: First constitution; in effect during Revolutionary War and immediate aftermath
    • Structure: Unicameral legislature (Congress); no executive or judicial branch; "league of friendship" among sovereign states
    • Powers of Congress: Declare war, make treaties, coin money, establish post office, settle disputes between states
    • Limitations: No power to tax (only request funds from states), no power to regulate commerce, no power to enforce laws, required unanimous consent for amendments, each state had one vote
    • Problems:
      • Inability to raise revenue led to debt and inability to pay soldiers
      • Trade disputes between states damaged economy
      • No way to enforce compliance with treaties (angered Britain, Spain)
      • Shays' Rebellion (1786-87) exposed inability to maintain order
    • Significance: Demonstrated need for stronger central government; led to Constitutional Convention; showed dangers of too weak a government
  • THE CONSTITUTION (1789)
    • Context: Philadelphia Convention (1787) replaced Articles with new framework
    • Structure: Seven articles establishing three branches, federalism, amendment process, supremacy clause
    • Key Principles:
      • Popular Sovereignty - "We the People" establishes democratic foundation
      • Separation of Powers - Legislative (Article I), Executive (Article II), Judicial (Article III)
      • Checks and Balances - Each branch can limit the others
      • Federalism - Power divided between national and state governments
      • Limited Government - Enumerated powers, Bill of Rights constraints
      • Judicial Review - Implied power established in Marbury v. Madison
    • Flexibility: Amendment process (Article V), elastic clause (implied powers), vague language allows adaptation
    • Significance: Oldest written national constitution still in use; framework for stable, adaptable government; model for other nations
  • BRUTUS NO. 1 (1787)
    • Author: Anonymous Anti-Federalist (likely Robert Yates)
    • Context: Published during ratification debate to oppose Constitution
    • Main Arguments:
      • Republic Too Large - Geographic size and population diversity make representative government impractical; cannot reflect will of people
      • Federal Power Too Great - National government will swallow state governments; "necessary and proper" clause gives unlimited power
      • Taxation Threat - Federal power to tax will bankrupt states and people
      • Standing Army Danger - Federal army threatens liberty; historical lesson that standing armies lead to tyranny
      • No Bill of Rights - Constitution lacks protections for individual liberties
    • Key Quote: "In a republic, the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar...this is not practicable in the extent of country..."
    • Significance: Represents Anti-Federalist concerns; influenced addition of Bill of Rights; ongoing debate over federal power
  • FEDERALIST NO. 10 (1787)
    • Author: James Madison (as "Publius")
    • Context: Published to promote Constitution ratification
    • Problem: Factions (groups united by self-interest contrary to common good) are inevitable in free society
    • Solutions Rejected:
      • Remove liberty (worse than disease)
      • Give everyone same opinions/interests (impractical)
      • Small direct democracy (tyranny of majority)
    • Madison's Solution:
      • Large Republic - More factions mean less likely any one dominates; diversity of interests provides checks
      • Representative Government - Representatives filter and refine public views; larger districts mean more qualified representatives
      • Extended Territory - Geographic size makes coordination among factions difficult
    • Key Quote: "Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive..."
    • Significance: Explains why large republic is superior to small democracy; foundational defense of pluralism; still relevant to interest group politics
  • FEDERALIST NO. 51 (1788)
    • Author: James Madison (as "Publius")
    • Context: Defending Constitution's structure and checks and balances
    • Main Arguments:
      • Separation of Powers - Each department must have "a will of its own"; independent selection and tenure
      • Checks and Balances - "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition"; each branch defends its prerogatives
      • Human Nature - If men were angels, no government needed; since not, government must control governed and itself
      • Compound Republic - Federalism (national/state division) provides additional security; "double security" for liberty
    • Key Quotes:
      • "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition"
      • "If men were angels, no government would be necessary"
      • "In framing a government...you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself"
    • Significance: Classic explanation of separation of powers and checks and balances; justifies institutional complexity
  • FEDERALIST NO. 70 (1788)
    • Author: Alexander Hamilton (as "Publius")
    • Context: Defending unitary executive (single president)
    • Main Arguments:
      • Energy in Executive - Strong executive necessary for good government; provides decisiveness, activity, secrecy, dispatch
      • Unity is Essential - Single executive better than plural; avoids disagreement, delay, responsibility diffusion
      • Accountability - Single person can be held responsible; plural executive allows blame-shifting
      • Against Executive Council - Advisory councils dilute responsibility without improving decisions
    • Key Quote: "Energy in the executive is a leading character in the definition of good government"
    • Significance: Justifies presidential power; ongoing relevance to debates about executive authority, unitary executive theory
  • FEDERALIST NO. 78 (1788)
    • Author: Alexander Hamilton (as "Publius")
    • Context: Defending independent judiciary and judicial review
    • Main Arguments:
      • "Least Dangerous Branch" - Judiciary has "neither force nor will, but merely judgment"; controls neither purse nor sword
      • Independence Essential - Lifetime tenure necessary for judicial independence; protects against political pressure
      • Judicial Review - Courts must declare unconstitutional laws void; Constitution superior to ordinary legislation; judges are guardians of Constitution
      • Limited Power - Judiciary depends on executive for enforcement, legislature for impeachment/jurisdiction
    • Key Quotes:
      • Judiciary is "the least dangerous" branch
      • "The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts"
      • "The constitution ought to be preferred to the statute"
    • Significance: First articulation of judicial review before Marbury v. Madison; justifies judicial independence and life tenure
  • LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL (1963)
    • Author: Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
    • Context: Written during imprisonment for participating in nonviolent protests in Birmingham, Alabama; response to white clergy criticizing demonstrations
    • Main Arguments:
      • Just vs. Unjust Laws
        • Just law: Squares with moral law; uplifts human personality; applies equally
        • Unjust law: Out of harmony with moral law; degrades human personality; imposed on minority that had no voice in making it
        • Moral obligation to disobey unjust laws
      • Criticism of "White Moderate" - More obstacle than KKK; prefers "negative peace" (absence of tension) over "positive peace" (presence of justice); says "wait" which means "never"
      • Nonviolent Direct Action - Creates tension/crisis that forces negotiation; "constructive nonviolent tension"
      • Urgency - "Justice too long delayed is justice denied"; "wait" has meant "never"
    • Key Quotes:
      • " Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
      • "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws"
      • "We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed"
    • Significance: Philosophical foundation for civil disobedience; influenced Civil Rights Movement; ongoing relevance to social justice movements; connects to American tradition of protest (Boston Tea Party, Thoreau)
📝 Bill of Rights (Amendments 1-10) ▼
  • 1st Amendment - Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, petition
    • Establishment Clause - no official religion
    • Free Exercise Clause - practice religion freely
    • Most fundamental freedoms; cornerstone of democracy
  • 2nd Amendment - Right to bear arms
    • "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
    • Interpreted as individual right in Heller and McDonald
  • 3rd Amendment - No quartering of soldiers in private homes without consent
    • Response to British practice; rarely invoked today
  • 4th Amendment - Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
    • Requires warrants based on probable cause
    • Exclusionary rule - illegally obtained evidence inadmissible
    • Basis for privacy rights
  • 5th Amendment - Rights in criminal cases
    • Grand jury indictment for serious crimes
    • Protection against double jeopardy (tried twice for same offense)
    • Right against self-incrimination ("plead the Fifth")
    • Due process clause - government cannot deprive life, liberty, property without due process
    • Takings clause - eminent domain requires just compensation
  • 6th Amendment - Rights of accused in criminal prosecutions
    • Speedy and public trial
    • Impartial jury
    • Informed of charges
    • Confront witnesses
    • Compel favorable witnesses
    • Right to counsel (attorney)
  • 7th Amendment - Right to jury trial in civil cases
    • Applies to federal civil cases exceeding $20
    • Not incorporated to states
  • 8th Amendment - Protection against excessive punishment
    • No excessive bail or fines
    • No cruel and unusual punishment
    • Basis for challenges to death penalty, prison conditions
  • 9th Amendment - Rights retained by the people
    • "Enumeration...of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"
    • Acknowledges unenumerated rights
    • Used to support right to privacy
  • 10th Amendment - Powers reserved to states and people
    • "Powers not delegated to the United States...are reserved to the States...or to the people"
    • Federalism principle; limits federal power
    • Basis for states' rights arguments
📋 Subsequent Amendments (11-27) ▼
  • 11th (1795) - State sovereign immunity from federal lawsuits by citizens of other states
  • 12th (1804) - Separate electoral votes for President and Vice President; prevents tie between running mates
  • 13th (1865) - Abolished slavery and involuntary servitude (except as punishment for crime)
  • 14th (1868) - Citizenship clause, due process, equal protection
    • All persons born/naturalized in U.S. are citizens
    • States cannot abridge privileges/immunities
    • Due process clause - basis for incorporation of Bill of Rights
    • Equal protection clause - foundation for civil rights
  • 15th (1870) - Voting rights cannot be denied based on race, color, or previous servitude
    • Circumvented by literacy tests, poll taxes, grandfather clauses until Voting Rights Act (1965)
  • 16th (1913) - Authorized federal income tax without apportionment among states
  • 17th (1913) - Direct election of senators by popular vote (previously chosen by state legislatures)
  • 18th (1919) - Prohibition of alcohol
    • Only amendment later repealed (by 21st)
  • 19th (1920) - Women's suffrage; voting rights cannot be denied based on sex
  • 20th (1933) - "Lame Duck" Amendment
    • Moved presidential inauguration from March 4 to January 20
    • Congressional terms begin January 3
    • Reduced transition period
  • 21st (1933) - Repealed 18th Amendment (prohibition); ended nationwide alcohol ban
  • 22nd (1951) - Presidential term limits; maximum two terms (or 10 years total)
    • Response to FDR's four terms
  • 23rd (1961) - Washington D.C. granted electoral votes (equal to least populous state = 3)
  • 24th (1964) - Prohibited poll taxes in federal elections
    • Removed financial barrier to voting
  • 25th (1967) - Presidential succession and disability
    • VP becomes President if President removed/dies/resigns
    • President nominates new VP (subject to congressional approval)
    • Procedures for temporary/permanent presidential disability
  • 26th (1971) - Lowered voting age to 18
    • Response to Vietnam War ("old enough to fight, old enough to vote")
  • 27th (1992) - Congressional pay changes take effect only after next election
    • Originally proposed 1789; ratified 203 years later
    • Prevents Congress from immediately raising own salaries
⚖️ Required Supreme Court Cases ▼
  • MARBURY V. MADISON (1803)
    • Facts: William Marbury appointed Justice of Peace by outgoing President Adams; commission not delivered before Jefferson took office; new Secretary of State Madison refused to deliver it
    • Issue: Can courts compel executive officials to perform duties? Does Supreme Court have jurisdiction?
    • Holding: Supreme Court cannot issue writ of mandamus; section of Judiciary Act granting this power is unconstitutional
    • Reasoning: Constitution is supreme law; laws contrary to Constitution are void; courts have duty to interpret Constitution and declare laws unconstitutional
    • Significance: Established judicial review - power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional; made judiciary co-equal branch; foundation of constitutional law
  • MCCULLOCH V. MARYLAND (1819)
    • Facts: Congress created Second Bank of United States; Maryland taxed bank to drive it out; bank cashier McCulloch refused to pay
    • Issues: Does Congress have power to create national bank? Can states tax federal institutions?
    • Holding: Congress has implied power to create bank; Maryland cannot tax federal institution
    • Reasoning: Necessary and Proper Clause grants implied powers; "power to tax is power to destroy" - states cannot tax federal government; national supremacy over states
    • Significance: Broadly interpreted federal powers; established federal supremacy; limited state interference with federal government; expansive view of implied powers
  • SCHENCK V. UNITED STATES (1919)
    • Facts: Charles Schenck distributed leaflets urging resistance to WWI draft; charged with violating Espionage Act
    • Issue: Does First Amendment protect anti-war speech?
    • Holding: Conviction upheld; speech not protected in this context
    • Reasoning: "Clear and present danger" test - speech can be limited if it creates clear and present danger of substantive evils Congress has right to prevent; context matters (wartime vs. peacetime)
    • Significance: Established that First Amendment not absolute; government can restrict speech in certain circumstances; famous analogy: "falsely shouting fire in a theatre"
    • Note: Later refined by Brandenburg test (imminent lawless action)
  • BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION (1954)
    • Facts: Black students denied admission to white schools under "separate but equal" doctrine from Plessy v. Ferguson
    • Issue: Does school segregation violate Equal Protection Clause?
    • Holding: School segregation is unconstitutional; "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal"
    • Reasoning: Segregation generates feeling of inferiority; affects motivation to learn; deprives minority children of equal educational opportunities; psychological harm
    • Significance: Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson; catalyst for Civil Rights Movement; ended legal segregation; difficult enforcement (Brown II required desegregation "with all deliberate speed")
  • BAKER V. CARR (1962)
    • Facts: Tennessee hadn't reapportioned legislative districts since 1901 despite population changes; urban areas underrepresented
    • Issue: Is legislative reapportionment a justiciable question (can courts decide) or political question?
    • Holding: Reapportionment challenges are justiciable; federal courts can hear these cases
    • Reasoning: Equal Protection Clause violated by malapportionment; not merely political question
    • Significance: Opened door to "one person, one vote" principle; led to nationwide redistricting; increased urban/suburban representation; courts can review redistricting
  • ENGEL V. VITALE (1962)
    • Facts: New York Board of Regents composed official prayer for public schools; voluntary but officially sanctioned
    • Issue: Does school-sponsored prayer violate Establishment Clause?
    • Holding: Official school prayer unconstitutional, even if voluntary
    • Reasoning: Government cannot compose official prayers; violates Establishment Clause; coercive nature of school setting; doesn't matter if prayer is denominationally neutral or voluntary
    • Significance: Prohibited official school-sponsored religious activities; controversial decision; led to other cases limiting school religious practices; reinforced separation of church and state
  • GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT (1963)
    • Facts: Clarence Gideon charged with felony in Florida; too poor to afford lawyer; request for appointed counsel denied; convicted
    • Issue: Does Sixth Amendment right to counsel apply to state felony cases?
    • Holding: States must provide attorneys for indigent defendants in felony cases
    • Reasoning: Right to counsel fundamental to fair trial; incorporated to states via 14th Amendment Due Process; cannot have fair trial without lawyer
    • Significance: Established right to appointed counsel in state felony cases; created public defender systems; selective incorporation of 6th Amendment; fundamental to criminal justice
  • TINKER V. DES MOINES (1969)
    • Facts: Students wore black armbands to protest Vietnam War; suspended for violating school policy
    • Issue: Do students have First Amendment rights in school?
    • Holding: Students' symbolic speech protected; suspension violated First Amendment
    • Reasoning: Students don't "shed constitutional rights at schoolhouse gate"; symbolic speech protected unless causes substantial disruption; silent, passive expression; school must show more than fear of disturbance
    • Significance: Established student speech rights; schools must balance order with liberty; standard: substantial disruption or invasion of others' rights; foundation for student rights cases
  • NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. UNITED STATES (1971) - "Pentagon Papers"
    • Facts: New York Times obtained classified study of Vietnam War; government sought injunction to prevent publication
    • Issue: Can government prevent publication of classified information (prior restraint)?
    • Holding: Government cannot prevent publication; prior restraint unconstitutional
    • Reasoning: Prior restraint presumed unconstitutional; heavy burden on government to justify; First Amendment protects press freedom; didn't show grave and irreparable danger
    • Significance: Strong protection for press freedom; prior restraint almost never allowed; government can prosecute after publication but rarely prevent publication; watchdog role of press
  • WISCONSIN V. YODER (1972)
    • Facts: Amish parents refused to send children to school past 8th grade; violated compulsory education law
    • Issue: Does Free Exercise Clause exempt Amish from compulsory education laws?
    • Holding: Amish entitled to exemption based on religious beliefs
    • Reasoning: Compulsory high school attendance violated sincerely held religious beliefs; state interest in education didn't outweigh Free Exercise; long tradition of self-sufficient Amish community
    • Significance: Established religious exemption from neutral laws when sincere beliefs burdened; balanced state interest against religious freedom; limited by later cases
  • SHAW V. RENO (1993)
    • Facts: North Carolina created majority-minority district with bizarre shape to comply with Voting Rights Act
    • Issue: Does race-based redistricting violate Equal Protection?
    • Holding: Racial gerrymandering subject to strict scrutiny; district's shape suggested racial motivation
    • Reasoning: Using race as predominant factor in drawing districts triggers strict scrutiny; must serve compelling interest and be narrowly tailored; "political apartheid"
    • Significance: Limits on race-conscious redistricting; balancing minority representation with Equal Protection; ongoing tension with Voting Rights Act compliance
  • UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ (1995)
    • Facts: Alfonso Lopez brought gun to school; charged under Gun-Free School Zones Act (federal law)
    • Issue: Does Commerce Clause give Congress power to regulate guns near schools?
    • Holding: Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeds Congress's Commerce Clause power; unconstitutional
    • Reasoning: Gun possession near school not economic activity; too attenuated from interstate commerce; if allowed, no limit to federal power; categories of commerce power: channels, instrumentalities, activities substantially affecting commerce
    • Significance: First case in decades to limit Commerce Clause; reasserted limits on federal power; federalism decision; states have primary role in criminal law
  • MCDONALD V. CHICAGO (2010)
    • Facts: Chicago banned handgun possession; McDonald challenged under Second Amendment
    • Issue: Does Second Amendment apply to states?
    • Holding: Second Amendment incorporated to states via 14th Amendment; Chicago handgun ban unconstitutional
    • Reasoning: Right to keep and bear arms is fundamental right necessary to our system of ordered liberty; self-defense is core component; incorporated through Due Process Clause
    • Significance: Extended Heller to states; incorporated Second Amendment; limits on state/local gun regulations; ongoing debate about scope of right and permissible regulations
  • CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC (2010)
    • Facts: Citizens United wanted to air film critical of Hillary Clinton near primary election; FEC said violated campaign finance law prohibiting corporate electioneering
    • Issue: Can government restrict corporate political spending?
    • Holding: Corporate independent political expenditures protected by First Amendment; restrictions unconstitutional
    • Reasoning: Political speech is most protected speech; corporations have free speech rights; independent expenditures don't cause corruption or appearance thereof; cannot restrict speech based on speaker's identity
    • Significance: Transformed campaign finance; enabled Super PACs; unlimited independent expenditures; highly controversial; concerns about corporate influence vs. free speech protection
📚 AP US Government Exam Format ▼
  • Exam Structure: 3 hours total
    • Section I: 55 Multiple Choice Questions - 80 minutes (50% of score)
    • Section II: 4 Free Response Questions - 100 minutes (50% of score)
  • Multiple Choice Section
    • 55 questions in 80 minutes (about 1.5 minutes per question)
    • Questions may be discrete or in sets based on stimulus (text, chart, graph, political cartoon, map)
    • Skills Tested:
      • Concept identification and explanation
      • Comparison of political principles and processes
      • Interpretation of data and visual sources
      • Application of concepts to scenarios
    • Content Distribution:
      • Unit 1 (Foundations): 15-22%
      • Unit 2 (Branches): 25-36%
      • Unit 3 (Civil Liberties/Rights): 13-18%
      • Unit 4 (Ideologies/Beliefs): 10-15%
      • Unit 5 (Participation): 20-27%
    • Strategies:
      • Read questions carefully; identify what's being asked
      • Eliminate obviously wrong answers
      • Pay attention to qualifiers (always, never, most, least)
      • Use process of elimination
      • Don't leave blanks - no penalty for guessing
  • Free Response Question 1: Concept Application (20 minutes recommended)
    • Format: Authentic political scenario followed by 3 tasks
    • Points: 3 total (1 point per task)
    • Tasks typically include:
      • (a) Describe political institution, behavior, or process
      • (b) Explain how scenario illustrates concept
      • (c) Explain effect or consequence of action described
    • Strategies:
      • Read scenario carefully; identify key institutions/processes
      • Answer each part completely but concisely
      • Use specific details from scenario
      • Define terms clearly
      • Make explicit connections between scenario and concepts
  • Free Response Question 2: Quantitative Analysis (20 minutes recommended)
    • Format: Data presented in table, chart, graph, infographic, or map
    • Points: 4 total
    • Tasks typically include:
      • (a) Describe data/pattern shown (1 point)
      • (b) Describe similarity/difference or trend (1 point)
      • (c) Draw conclusion or explain cause of pattern (1 point)
      • (d) Explain how data relates to political principle/process (1 point)
    • Strategies:
      • Read title, labels, legend carefully
      • Identify clear patterns, trends, outliers
      • Use specific numbers from data
      • Make comparisons explicit
      • Connect data to broader political concepts
  • Free Response Question 3: SCOTUS Comparison (20 minutes recommended)
    • Format: Required SCOTUS case compared with non-required case (description provided)
    • Points: 4 total
    • Tasks typically include:
      • (a) Identify constitutional clause/amendment (1 point)
      • (b) Describe facts, issue, or holding of required case (1 point)
      • (c) Explain similarity or difference in reasoning/holding (1 point)
      • (d) Describe interaction between case and political institution/process (1 point)
    • Strategies:
      • Know required cases thoroughly (facts, issues, holdings, reasoning)
      • Read non-required case description carefully
      • Make direct comparisons
      • Be specific about similarities/differences
      • Connect to broader constitutional principles
  • Free Response Question 4: Argument Essay (40 minutes recommended)
    • Format: Prompt requiring argument supported by evidence from foundational documents and reasoning
    • Points: 6 total
    • Rubric:
      • Thesis/Claim (1 point): Respond to prompt with defensible claim or thesis
      • Evidence from Documents (2 points):
        • 1 point: Use content from one foundational document
        • 2 points: Use content from two foundational documents
      • Evidence from Course (1 point): Use reasoning/examples from course beyond documents
      • Reasoning (1 point): Explain how evidence supports thesis; use logical line of reasoning
      • Respond to Opposing View (1 point): Acknowledge and refute alternative perspective
    • Strategies:
      • Take 5-10 minutes to plan before writing
      • Create clear, defensible thesis that directly answers prompt
      • Choose foundational documents you know well
      • Quote/paraphrase specific content from documents
      • Explain how evidence supports your argument (analysis, not just description)
      • Consider counterarguments and explain why your position is stronger
      • Organize clearly with introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion
      • Leave time to proofread
  • General FRQ Tips
    • Budget time carefully (20-20-20-40 recommended)
    • Answer all parts of each question
    • Use political science terminology accurately
    • Be specific - avoid vague generalities
    • Write in complete sentences
    • Label your responses (a, b, c, d)
    • If you finish early, review and add details
    • Quality over quantity - concise, accurate responses better than rambling
  • Study Strategies
    • Know foundational documents: Not just names - understand arguments, quotes, significance
    • Know SCOTUS cases: Facts, constitutional issues, holdings, reasoning, significance
    • Understand political processes: How bills become laws, how elections work, how courts operate
    • Practice with real questions: Use released exams from College Board
    • Create study guides: Charts comparing institutions, timelines, flashcards for cases/documents
    • Follow current events: Apply course concepts to real-world politics
    • Form study groups: Teach concepts to others to reinforce understanding
  • Exam Day Tips
    • Get good sleep night before
    • Eat breakfast
    • Bring required materials (pens, pencils, ID)
    • Arrive early to testing location
    • Read all directions carefully
    • Manage time - don't spend too long on any one question
    • Stay calm - if stuck, move on and return later
    • Use all available time - review answers if finish early
💡 Key Terms to Know ▼
  • Federalism - Division of power between national and state governments
  • Bicameral - Two-chamber legislature (House and Senate)
  • Judicial Review - Power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional
  • Selective Incorporation - Applying Bill of Rights to states through 14th Amendment
  • Gerrymandering - Drawing district boundaries for political advantage
  • Filibuster - Senate tactic to delay/block legislation through extended debate
  • Cloture - 60-vote requirement to end Senate filibuster
  • Executive Order - Presidential directive with force of law
  • Precedent (Stare Decisis) - Following previous court decisions
  • Strict Scrutiny - Highest standard of judicial review (race, religion)
  • Political Efficacy - Belief that one's participation makes a difference
  • Retrospective Voting - Voting based on past performance
  • Super PAC - Independent expenditure committee with no contribution limits
  • Iron Triangle - Alliance between congressional committee, agency, interest group
  • Divided Government - Different parties control executive and legislative branches
Tags:
Shares: