- Workers will naturally compare their efforts or rewards to those of others in the workplace.
- The degree of equity in an organisation is based on the ratio of inputs (contributions made by the employee) to outcomes (financial and non-financial rewards).
Degrees of equity
Equity norm: workers expect an equitable remuneration for their contribution in their jobs.
Social comparison: workers determine what is fair based on comparisons of their inputs and outcomes with those of their peers.
Cognitive distortions: workers who feel undercompensated become demotivated so might withdraw any goodwill, resulting in altering their effort or outputs.
Drawbacks
- Equity is subjective.
- Some people may be more sensitive to equity.
- Neglects to include demographic, psychological, and cultural variables.
- Scale of equity can only be so useful.
Frequently Asked Questions: Adam's Equity Theory
What is Adam's Equity Theory?
+
Adam's Equity Theory, proposed by psychologist J.S. Adams in 1965, is a motivation theory that suggests individuals are motivated by fairness. It posits that employees compare their input-to-output ratio with that of relevant others (colleagues in similar positions, or even themselves in past jobs).
What is the core principle or basis of Adam's Equity Theory?
+
The basis of the theory is the comparison process:
(Your Inputs / Your Outcomes) vs. (Other's Inputs / Other's Outcomes)
Inputs are what an individual contributes to the relationship or job (e.g., effort, skill, time, loyalty). Outcomes are what they receive in return (e.g., salary, benefits, recognition, status). People strive for their ratio to be equal to the ratio of their comparison referent.
Inputs are what an individual contributes to the relationship or job (e.g., effort, skill, time, loyalty). Outcomes are what they receive in return (e.g., salary, benefits, recognition, status). People strive for their ratio to be equal to the ratio of their comparison referent.
Who do individuals compare themselves to in this theory?
+
Individuals compare themselves to various "referent groups" or individuals. These can include:
- Self-Inside: The individual's experience in a different position within the same organization.
- Self-Outside: The individual's experience in a position outside the current organization.
- Other-Inside: Another individual or group of individuals within the same organization.
- Other-Outside: Another individual or group of individuals outside the organization.
What happens when inequity is perceived?
+
According to the theory, perceiving inequity (either being under-rewarded or over-rewarded relative to others) creates tension or distress. This tension motivates the individual to take action to restore a state of equity or fairness. The greater the perceived inequity, the greater the motivation to reduce it.
How can people restore perceived equity?
+
Individuals may employ several strategies to reduce the tension caused by perceived inequity:
- Alter their inputs: Work less hard, arrive late, take longer breaks.
- Alter their outcomes: Ask for a raise, seek recognition, steal supplies (less common/ethical).
- Distort their perceptions: Convince themselves their effort isn't as high, or the other person's outcomes aren't as good.
- Distort perceptions of others: Rationalize that the other person works harder or deserves more.
- Choose a different referent: Compare themselves to someone else who makes the ratio seem fairer.
- Leave the field: Quit the job or leave the relationship causing the inequity.
How does Adam's Equity Theory relate to motivation?
+
The theory explains motivation by focusing on the desire for fairness. When individuals perceive inequity, they are motivated to act to reduce that tension and restore equity. This motivation can manifest in various behaviors, such as decreasing effort (if under-rewarded) or increasing effort (if over-rewarded, though this is less common and often temporary), or leaving the situation. Fair treatment is seen as a strong motivator for maintaining performance and satisfaction.