IB Economics SL

Free Trade & Trade Protection | The Global Economy | IB Economics SL

Unit 4: The Global Economy - Free Trade & Trade Protection

Understanding International Trade! International trade is fundamental to the modern global economy, allowing countries to specialize, access a wider variety of goods, and benefit from comparative advantage. However, the debate between free trade and protectionism remains contentious. While economists generally favor free trade for its efficiency and welfare gains, governments often implement protectionist measures to shield domestic industries, protect jobs, and achieve strategic objectives. This unit examines the benefits of free trade, various forms of trade protection, and the compelling arguments on both sides of this critical economic debate.

1. Introduction to International Trade

International Trade: The exchange of goods and services across national borders. Countries export goods they produce and import goods produced elsewhere, creating a global network of economic interdependence.

Why Countries Trade

Fundamental Reasons for Trade:
  • Different factor endowments: Countries have different amounts of land, labor, capital, natural resources
  • Different technology: Varying levels of technological development and innovation
  • Different climates: Some goods can only be produced in certain climates
  • Economies of scale: Larger markets allow more efficient production
  • Consumer preferences: Demand for variety and foreign products
  • Comparative advantage: Countries can produce some goods more efficiently relatively

2. Theory of Comparative Advantage

Absolute Advantage: The ability of a country to produce a good using fewer resources than another country. A country has absolute advantage if it can produce more output with the same inputs.
Comparative Advantage: The ability of a country to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another country. Even if a country has absolute advantage in all goods, it still benefits from trade by specializing in goods where it has comparative advantage.
Opportunity Cost Formula: \[ \text{Opportunity Cost of Good A} = \frac{\text{Units of Good B given up}}{\text{Units of Good A gained}} \]

Comparative Advantage Rule:
A country has comparative advantage in the good with the lower opportunity cost
Numerical Example: Two Countries, Two Goods

Production Possibilities (per hour of labor):
CountryWheat (tons)Cloth (meters)
Country A63
Country B22

Step 1: Identify Absolute Advantage
  • Country A has absolute advantage in both wheat (6 > 2) and cloth (3 > 2)
  • Country A is more productive in everything

Step 2: Calculate Opportunity Costs

Country A:
  • Opportunity cost of 1 ton wheat = 3/6 = 0.5 meters cloth
  • Opportunity cost of 1 meter cloth = 6/3 = 2 tons wheat

Country B:
  • Opportunity cost of 1 ton wheat = 2/2 = 1 meter cloth
  • Opportunity cost of 1 meter cloth = 2/2 = 1 ton wheat

Step 3: Identify Comparative Advantage
  • Wheat: Country A's opportunity cost (0.5) < Country B's (1) → Country A has comparative advantage in wheat
  • Cloth: Country B's opportunity cost (1) < Country A's (2) → Country B has comparative advantage in cloth

Step 4: Specialization and Trade
  • Country A should specialize in wheat (where it has comparative advantage)
  • Country B should specialize in cloth (where it has comparative advantage)
  • Both countries can then trade and both benefit
  • Total world production increases through specialization
Key Insights from Comparative Advantage:
  • Even if one country is better at producing everything (absolute advantage in all goods), trade is still beneficial
  • Countries should specialize in goods where they have comparative advantage (lowest opportunity cost)
  • Trade allows both countries to consume beyond their production possibilities
  • Total world output increases through specialization and trade
  • Both countries gain from trade (win-win situation)

3. Benefits of Free Trade

Free Trade: International trade without government-imposed barriers such as tariffs, quotas, or subsidies. Goods and services flow freely across borders based on market forces of supply and demand.

Economic Benefits

1. Gains from Specialization and Comparative Advantage
  • Countries specialize in production where they have lowest opportunity cost
  • Resources allocated most efficiently globally
  • Total world output increases
  • Higher living standards for all countries
  • Consumption possibilities expand beyond domestic production
2. Lower Prices for Consumers
  • Competition from imports forces domestic firms to be efficient
  • Consumers access cheaper foreign goods
  • Purchasing power increases
  • Real incomes rise
  • Especially benefits lower-income households
3. Greater Choice and Variety
  • Access to goods not produced domestically
  • Different qualities, brands, styles available
  • Seasonal products available year-round
  • Consumer welfare increases from variety
  • Example: Tropical fruits in cold climates, electronics from various manufacturers
4. Economies of Scale
  • Access to larger global markets allows mass production
  • Average costs fall as output increases
  • More efficient production
  • Lower prices for consumers
  • Particularly important for small countries
5. Increased Competition and Efficiency
  • Domestic firms face competition from imports
  • Forces firms to innovate and reduce costs
  • Eliminates inefficient producers
  • Improves productivity across economy
  • Prevents domestic monopolies from exploiting consumers
  • Dynamic efficiency gains over time
6. Technology Transfer and Innovation
  • Importing advanced technology and capital goods
  • Knowledge spillovers from foreign firms
  • Exposure to new production methods
  • Foreign direct investment brings expertise
  • Accelerates technological progress
7. Export-Led Growth
  • Export industries expand, creating jobs
  • Foreign exchange earnings
  • Multiplier effects through economy
  • Investment in export sectors
  • Economic growth and development
  • Examples: Asian Tigers (South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong)
8. Access to Resources and Raw Materials
  • Import resources not available domestically
  • Essential for manufacturing and industry
  • Example: Japan imports oil, raw materials for manufacturing
9. Political and Cultural Benefits
  • Economic interdependence reduces conflict
  • Countries with strong trade ties less likely to war
  • Cultural exchange and understanding
  • Cooperation on global issues

4. Trade Protection

Trade Protection (Protectionism): Government policies that restrict or restrain international trade, typically with the intention of protecting domestic industries and jobs from foreign competition. Barriers placed on imports or support given to domestic producers.

Types of Trade Protection

1. Tariffs

Tariff: A tax on imported goods. Tariffs increase the price of imports, making them less competitive with domestic products.
How Tariffs Work:
  • Government imposes tax on imports (e.g., 20% tariff on imported cars)
  • Price of imports increases
  • Domestic goods become relatively cheaper
  • Consumers switch from imports to domestic products
  • Domestic producers benefit from reduced competition
📊 Tariff Analysis Diagram

Free Trade Situation:
  • • World price (Pw) below domestic equilibrium
  • • Domestic supply at Pw: Qs₁
  • • Domestic demand at Pw: Qd₁
  • • Imports = Qd₁ - Qs₁

After Tariff:
  • • Domestic price rises to Pw + tariff
  • • Domestic supply increases to Qs₂
  • • Domestic demand falls to Qd₂
  • • Imports fall to Qd₂ - Qs₂
  • • Government collects tariff revenue
Effects of Tariffs:

Winners:
  • Domestic producers: Higher prices, more sales, increased producer surplus
  • Government: Tariff revenue (tariff × quantity of imports)
  • Workers in protected industry: Jobs preserved or created

Losers:
  • Consumers: Higher prices, reduced consumer surplus, less choice
  • Importers: Reduced business
  • Exporting countries: Lost sales
  • Society overall: Deadweight loss (net welfare loss)

Overall Effect: Net welfare loss to society (deadweight loss) - losses exceed gains

2. Quotas

Quota: A physical limit on the quantity of a good that can be imported in a given time period (e.g., maximum 10,000 cars per year).
How Quotas Work:
  • Government sets maximum import quantity
  • Once quota filled, no more imports allowed
  • Reduced supply of imported goods
  • Price of good rises due to scarcity
  • Domestic producers benefit from higher prices and reduced competition

Effects Similar to Tariffs:
  • Higher domestic prices
  • Reduced imports
  • Increased domestic production
  • Reduced consumer surplus
  • Increased producer surplus
  • Deadweight loss

Key Difference from Tariffs:
  • With quota: Foreign exporters or quota holders capture "quota rent" (profit from scarcity)
  • With tariff: Government captures revenue as tax
  • Quota may be worse for domestic economy (revenue goes abroad)

3. Subsidies to Domestic Producers

Production Subsidy: Government payment to domestic producers to lower their costs of production, making them more competitive against imports without directly restricting imports.
How Subsidies Work:
  • Government pays domestic firms per unit produced
  • Lowers firms' costs of production
  • Domestic firms can lower prices and compete with imports
  • Domestic production increases
  • Imports may decrease (consumers switch to cheaper domestic goods)

Effects:
  • Domestic producers: Lower costs, more competitive, increased output
  • Consumers: May benefit from lower prices (if producers pass on savings)
  • Government: Fiscal cost (subsidy expenditure)
  • Taxpayers: Pay for subsidy through taxes
  • Foreign producers: Face tougher competition

Advantage over Tariffs/Quotas:
  • Consumers don't face higher prices (may get lower prices)
  • No deadweight loss from reduced consumption
  • Less trade distortion

Disadvantage:
  • Direct cost to government budget
  • Opportunity cost of funds
  • May support inefficient producers
  • Can violate WTO rules

4. Administrative Barriers (Hidden Protectionism)

Administrative Barriers: Bureaucratic rules and regulations that make importing difficult, expensive, or time-consuming, effectively restricting trade without explicit tariffs or quotas.
Types of Administrative Barriers:
  • Complex customs procedures: Lengthy paperwork, inspections
  • Technical standards: Product requirements that foreign goods struggle to meet
  • Health and safety regulations: Strict rules that exclude imports
  • Environmental standards: Requirements foreign producers can't meet
  • Licensing requirements: Difficult to obtain import permits
  • Labeling requirements: Expensive compliance for foreign firms

Example: Japan historically required extensive testing and documentation for imported products, effectively limiting imports

Advantage: Difficult to prove protectionist intent; appears as legitimate regulation
Disadvantage: Creates inefficiency, raises costs, reduces trade benefits

5. Voluntary Export Restraints (VERs)

Voluntary Export Restraint (VER): An agreement where an exporting country voluntarily agrees to limit its exports to another country, usually under threat of more severe protectionist measures.
Example: US-Japan automobile VER (1981-1994)
  • Japan agreed to limit car exports to US
  • Avoided tariffs or quotas US threatened to impose
  • Reduced Japanese imports, raised US car prices
  • Japanese manufacturers responded by exporting higher-value luxury cars
  • Eventually led to Japanese building factories in US

5. Arguments For Trade Protection

1. Infant Industry Argument

Logic:
  • New industries need time to develop and become competitive
  • Cannot compete initially against established foreign firms
  • Temporary protection allows them to achieve economies of scale
  • Learn production techniques, develop expertise
  • Once mature, protection can be removed

Conditions for Success:
  • Industry has genuine potential to become competitive
  • Protection is temporary (with clear timeline)
  • Government can identify which industries to protect

Problems:
  • Difficult to identify which industries will succeed
  • Protected industries may never become efficient (remain dependent)
  • Hard to remove protection politically (vested interests)
  • Consumers pay higher prices during protection period

Evidence: Mixed - Some success in East Asia (South Korea, Taiwan), but many failures elsewhere
2. National Security / Strategic Industries

Logic:
  • Some industries essential for national defense (weapons, steel, energy)
  • Cannot depend on foreign suppliers (may cut off in conflict)
  • Must maintain domestic capacity even if more expensive
  • Self-sufficiency in critical sectors necessary

Valid Concerns:
  • Defense equipment and technology
  • Food security (agricultural self-sufficiency)
  • Energy independence

Problems:
  • Definition of "strategic" often very broad (lobbying)
  • May be used to justify protection of many industries
  • Alternatives exist: stockpiling, alliances with reliable suppliers
  • High cost to consumers and economy
3. Protect Domestic Employment

Logic:
  • Imports destroy jobs in domestic industries
  • Unemployment creates social problems and costs
  • Protection saves jobs in import-competing sectors
  • Particularly important during recessions

Problems:
  • Jobs are saved but at high cost: Consumers pay higher prices to save each job (often hundreds of thousands per job)
  • Ignores jobs created by trade: Export industries create jobs; cheaper imports raise real incomes, increasing spending
  • Retaliation risk: Other countries protect their industries, reducing our exports
  • Maintains inefficiency: Resources trapped in uncompetitive industries instead of moving to efficient sectors
  • Only temporary solution: Eventually jobs lost anyway; better to help workers retrain
4. Protect Against Dumping

Dumping Definition: Selling exports at below cost of production or below domestic price

Why Dumping Occurs:
  • Dispose of surplus production
  • Gain market share by driving out competitors
  • Price discrimination (charge different prices in different markets)
  • Government subsidies allow below-cost sales

Anti-Dumping Argument:
  • Unfair competition (predatory pricing)
  • Foreign firms trying to monopolize market
  • Domestic firms bankrupted, then foreign firms raise prices
  • Legitimate to impose anti-dumping duties

Counter-Arguments:
  • Consumers benefit from low prices in short run
  • Difficult to prove predatory intent
  • Often just efficient foreign competition
  • Monopolization rarely happens (barriers to entry low in most industries)
  • Anti-dumping used as disguised protectionism
5. Correct Trade Imbalances

Logic:
  • Persistent trade deficits are problem
  • Protection reduces imports, improves trade balance
  • Prevents foreign debt accumulation

Problems:
  • Trade deficits not necessarily bad (can reflect investment, growth)
  • Other policies better (currency depreciation, boost competitiveness)
  • Protection may worsen deficit (retaliation reduces exports)
  • Ignores capital flows (deficits balanced by capital inflows)
6. Protect Against Unfair Competition / Cheap Foreign Labor

Argument:
  • Developing countries have very low wages
  • Domestic workers cannot compete
  • Unfair advantage due to poor labor standards
  • Creates race to the bottom in working conditions

Counter-Arguments:
  • Low wages reflect low productivity; not necessarily unfair advantage
  • Comparative advantage means differences in costs are basis for trade
  • Trade helps developing countries develop and raise standards
  • Protectionism harms workers in developing countries
  • If concerned about standards, better to promote international labor agreements
7. Raise Government Revenue

Logic:
  • Tariffs generate tax revenue for government
  • Historically important revenue source
  • Still important for developing countries with weak tax systems

Problems:
  • Better revenue sources exist (income tax, VAT)
  • Tariff revenue small in developed countries
  • Distorts trade and reduces welfare
  • As countries develop, should shift to other taxes
8. Environmental Protection

Argument:
  • Some countries have lax environmental standards
  • Creates unfair cost advantage
  • Encourages "pollution havens"
  • Need to protect against environmentally damaging imports

Counter-Arguments:
  • Better to negotiate international environmental agreements
  • Trade can spread cleaner technologies
  • May be disguised protectionism
  • Specific environmental measures better than broad trade restrictions

6. Arguments Against Trade Protection

1. Efficiency Loss / Deadweight Loss
  • Protection creates net welfare loss to society
  • Losses to consumers exceed gains to producers and government
  • Resources misallocated (trapped in inefficient industries)
  • Violates comparative advantage principle
  • Lower national income and living standards
2. Higher Prices for Consumers
  • Protection raises prices of protected goods
  • Reduces purchasing power and real incomes
  • Regressive (hurts poor disproportionately)
  • Consumers pay more for food, clothing, electronics, etc.
  • Example: Sugar protection in US raises costs for consumers and food manufacturers
3. Reduced Consumer Choice
  • Less variety of goods available
  • Lower quality products (less competition)
  • Innovation reduced
  • Consumer welfare falls
4. Retaliation and Trade Wars
  • Other countries retaliate with their own protection
  • Reduces exports, harms export industries
  • Spiral of increasing protection
  • All countries worse off
  • Historical Example: Smoot-Hawley Tariff (US 1930) → widespread retaliation → Great Depression worsened
  • Recent Example: US-China trade war (2018-2019)
5. Costs to Export Industries
  • Retaliation reduces market access for exporters
  • Higher input costs if imported inputs protected
  • Currency appreciation from reduced imports hurts exporters
  • Example: Protecting steel raises costs for automobile manufacturers
6. Entrenches Inefficiency
  • Protected firms have no incentive to improve
  • Become dependent on protection
  • Productivity growth slows
  • Innovation reduced
  • Economy becomes less competitive over time
  • Protection becomes permanent (politically impossible to remove)
7. Rent-Seeking and Corruption
  • Industries lobby for protection
  • Resources wasted on lobbying instead of productive activity
  • Political decision-making distorted
  • Corruption in allocation of quotas, licenses
  • Benefits concentrated (protected industry) while costs dispersed (all consumers)
8. Harms Developing Countries
  • Developed countries protect against developing country exports
  • Especially agricultural protection harms developing countries
  • Prevents developing countries from using their comparative advantage
  • Limits economic development opportunities
  • Hypocritical: developed countries used free trade to develop, then protect
9. Undermines International Cooperation
  • Violates spirit of WTO and trade agreements
  • Reduces trust between nations
  • Makes negotiating agreements harder
  • Can escalate to broader conflicts
10. Better Policy Alternatives Exist
  • For unemployment: Retraining programs, education, labor mobility support
  • For infant industries: Direct subsidies (less distortionary than tariffs)
  • For trade imbalances: Macroeconomic policies, exchange rate adjustment
  • For standards: International agreements, not unilateral protection

7. Evaluation Framework

When Might Protection Be Justified?

Possible Circumstances:
  • Infant industry: IF industry has genuine potential, protection is temporary with clear timeline, and government can identify winners
  • National security: For truly strategic industries (defense, critical infrastructure)
  • Severe economic crisis: Very temporary protection during major disruption (with plan to remove)
  • Dumping with predatory intent: If genuine evidence of predatory pricing to monopolize
  • Time for adjustment: Very temporary protection while workers retrain and transition

Important Conditions:
  • Protection must be temporary
  • Clear plan to remove protection
  • Combined with policies to improve competitiveness
  • Benefits must exceed costs
  • Not lead to retaliation

General Consensus

Economic Consensus:

Most economists agree:
  • Free trade is generally beneficial for overall welfare and efficiency
  • Protection usually reduces welfare (deadweight losses, higher prices)
  • Arguments for protection often flawed or could be addressed by better policies
  • BUT: Trade creates winners and losers (distributional concerns are real)
  • Better approach: Free trade + policies to help those harmed (retraining, education, social safety net)
  • Special cases exist where protection might be justified temporarily

8. Real-World Examples

Successful Free Trade: Asian Tigers

South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong (1960s-1990s)

Strategy:
  • Export-oriented industrialization
  • Gradually reduced protection
  • Invested heavily in education
  • Welcomed foreign investment

Results:
  • Rapid economic growth (8-10% annually for decades)
  • Transformed from developing to developed economies
  • Dramatic increases in living standards
  • Now among world's wealthiest countries

Lesson: Export-led growth with gradual trade liberalization very successful

Protectionism Gone Wrong: Import Substitution

Latin America (1950s-1980s)

Strategy:
  • Import substitution industrialization
  • High tariffs and quotas
  • Attempt to develop all industries domestically

Results:
  • Industries remained inefficient (never competitive)
  • Consumers paid high prices
  • Slow economic growth
  • Debt crises in 1980s

Lesson: Prolonged protection led to inefficiency and economic problems

Shift: Most Latin American countries liberalized trade in 1990s with better growth results

Trade War Example: US-China (2018-2019)

Events:
  • US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods (steel, aluminum, consumer goods)
  • China retaliated with tariffs on US goods (soybeans, pork, etc.)
  • Escalating cycle of tariffs

Effects:
  • Higher prices for US consumers and businesses
  • US farmers hurt by Chinese retaliation
  • Supply chain disruptions
  • Business uncertainty
  • Both countries' growth slowed
  • Minimal success in stated objectives

Lesson: Trade wars harm both sides; protectionism costly

9. IB Economics Exam Skills

Key Exam Question Types

Question Type 1: Explain with Diagram [6 marks]
Example: "Using a tariff diagram, explain the effects of a tariff on consumers and producers."

Answer Structure:
  • Define tariff (tax on imports)
  • Draw diagram showing:
    • Domestic supply and demand
    • World price (horizontal line)
    • Imports at world price
    • Tariff shifts price up
    • New import level (reduced)
  • Effects on consumers: Higher prices, reduced consumer surplus, buy less
  • Effects on producers: Higher prices, increased producer surplus, produce more
  • Government collects tariff revenue
  • Deadweight loss (welfare loss to society)
Question Type 2: Calculate Comparative Advantage [6 marks]
Example: Given production data, calculate opportunity costs and identify comparative advantage

Answer Structure:
  • Calculate opportunity cost for each good in each country
  • Compare opportunity costs
  • Identify comparative advantage (lower opportunity cost)
  • State which country should specialize in which good
  • Explain how both benefit from trade
Question Type 3: Evaluate Protectionism [10 marks]
Example: "Evaluate the use of tariffs to protect domestic employment."

Answer Structure:
  • Introduction: Define tariffs and employment protection objective
  • Arguments FOR:
    • Tariffs reduce imports, increase demand for domestic goods
    • Domestic production increases, jobs saved/created
    • Prevents unemployment and social costs
    • Particularly important in regions dependent on protected industry
    • Tariff diagram showing increased domestic production
  • Arguments AGAINST:
    • Very costly per job saved (consumers pay high prices)
    • Ignores jobs created by trade (exports, lower prices boost spending)
    • Retaliation risk (other countries protect, our exports fall, job losses there)
    • Inefficiency (resources trapped in uncompetitive sector)
    • Only temporary (eventually jobs lost anyway)
    • Better alternatives: retraining, education, unemployment support
    • Deadweight loss reduces overall welfare
  • Evaluation:
    • Short-run vs. long-run effects
    • Size of industry affected
    • Alternative employment opportunities
    • Risk of retaliation
    • Better to help workers adjust than protect inefficient industries
  • Judgment: Generally not effective or efficient way to protect employment
Question Type 4: Discuss Arguments [10 marks]
Example: "Discuss arguments for and against free trade."

Answer Structure:
  • Arguments FOR Free Trade:
    • Comparative advantage gains (specialization, efficiency)
    • Lower prices, greater choice for consumers
    • Increased competition drives innovation
    • Economies of scale
    • Export-led growth
    • Examples: Asian Tigers success
  • Arguments AGAINST Free Trade (For Protection):
    • Job losses in import-competing industries
    • Infant industry needs protection
    • National security concerns
    • Dumping by foreign firms
    • Examples: Import substitution failures show risks, but also some infant industry successes
  • Evaluation:
    • Economic theory and evidence favor free trade
    • BUT distributional concerns real (winners/losers)
    • Best approach: free trade + support for those harmed
    • Temporary protection might be justified in special cases
  • Conclusion: Free trade generally beneficial but need policies to address adjustment costs

Conclusion

International trade based on comparative advantage creates significant benefits: lower prices, greater choice, increased efficiency, and higher living standards. Free trade maximizes these gains by allowing resources to be allocated most efficiently globally. However, trade also creates winners and losers, leading governments to implement protectionist measures. While protection may serve short-term political objectives or address specific concerns like infant industries or national security, economic analysis shows that protectionism typically reduces overall welfare through higher prices, deadweight losses, and entrenched inefficiency. The strongest economic case favors free trade combined with domestic policies (education, retraining, social safety nets) to help those harmed by trade adjustment. Understanding both the benefits of trade and the arguments surrounding protection is essential for evaluating trade policy in our interconnected global economy.

Key Takeaways for IB Success:

  • Master comparative advantage calculations: opportunity cost, specialization, mutual gains
  • Understand and draw tariff diagrams showing effects on all stakeholders
  • Know multiple forms of protection: tariffs, quotas, subsidies, administrative barriers
  • Memorize key arguments FOR protection: infant industry, national security, employment, anti-dumping
  • Memorize key arguments AGAINST protection: efficiency loss, higher prices, retaliation, better alternatives
  • Evaluate systematically: short-run vs. long-run, winners vs. losers, costs vs. benefits
  • Use real-world examples: Asian Tigers (free trade success), Latin America (protection failure), US-China trade war
  • Distinguish between types of protection and their different effects
  • Understand deadweight loss concept and welfare analysis
  • Recognize economist consensus favors free trade but acknowledge distributional concerns
Exam Success Checklist:
  • ✓ For comparative advantage: Calculate ALL opportunity costs, compare, identify specialization
  • ✓ For tariff questions: Draw complete diagram with world price, tariff, changes in Qs, Qd, imports
  • ✓ Always discuss effects on multiple stakeholders: consumers, producers, government, society
  • ✓ For evaluation: Present balanced argument (arguments for AND against)
  • ✓ Use specific examples, not just theory
  • ✓ Mention deadweight loss and welfare effects
  • ✓ Consider short-run vs. long-run effects
  • ✓ Discuss better policy alternatives when criticizing protection
  • ✓ Address retaliation risk when discussing protection
  • ✓ Conclude with reasoned judgment based on analysis
Shares: