Complete Catalog of LSAT Question Types: Prep Guide
The LSAT tests your reasoning skills through specific, predictable question types. According to LSAC, understanding these question types and developing type-specific strategies is essential for LSAT success. This comprehensive catalog covers all Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension question types, their frequencies, difficulty levels, and proven approaches for each.
Understanding the LSAT Question Type System
The LSAT's multiple-choice sections test your abilities through two main question categories, each with distinct types that require specific strategies. Mastering these question types is crucial because each one tests different skills and demands different approaches.
💡 Strategic Approach: You don't need to master all question types equally. Focus your study time on high-frequency types where you have the most room for improvement. The top 5 question types account for over 60% of Logical Reasoning questions.
Logical Reasoning Question Types
Logical Reasoning comprises two sections totaling approximately 50 questions, making it 50% of your LSAT score. According to LSAC, these questions assess your ability to analyze, critically evaluate, and complete arguments as they occur in ordinary language.
Question Type Categories
Logical Reasoning questions can be organized into functional categories based on what they ask you to do:
| Category | What You Do | Question Types Included |
|---|---|---|
| Argument Analysis | Identify components and structure | Main Point, Method of Reasoning, Role of Statement |
| Assumption Finding | Find unstated premises | Necessary Assumption, Sufficient Assumption, Flaw |
| Argument Evaluation | Assess and modify strength | Strengthen, Weaken, Evaluate |
| Inference Drawing | Conclude from facts | Must Be True, Cannot Be True, Inference |
| Reasoning Matching | Match logical patterns | Parallel Reasoning, Parallel Flaw |
| Problem Solving | Resolve contradictions | Paradox/Resolve, Point at Issue |
| Principle Application | Apply general rules | Principle (Identify), Principle (Apply) |
1. Flaw in the Reasoning ~16% Frequency Hard
What It Asks: Identify the logical error in the argument's reasoning.
Common Question Stems:
- "The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that it..."
- "The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it..."
- "Which of the following describes an error in the argument's reasoning?"
- "A flaw in the argument is that it..."
Strategy:
- Identify the conclusion and premises
- Determine what the author assumes
- Identify what the author overlooks or fails to establish
- Match to common flaw patterns (see below)
- Eliminate answers that describe reasoning that isn't present
Common Flaws to Recognize:
- Correlation ≠ Causation: Assumes correlation proves causation
- Unrepresentative Sample: Generalizes from biased sample
- False Dichotomy: Assumes only two options exist
- Circular Reasoning: Uses conclusion as a premise
- Ad Hominem: Attacks person rather than argument
- Overlooking Alternatives: Fails to consider other possibilities
- Equivocation: Uses same word with different meanings
- Percent vs. Amount: Confuses percentage with absolute numbers
Flaw Recognition Formula:
\[ \text{Identify: } P \not\rightarrow C \text{ (gap exists)} \]
\[ \text{Describe: What makes } P \not\rightarrow C \]
2. Must Be True / Inference ~14% Frequency Medium
What It Asks: Identify what must be true based on the stated information (no argument, just facts).
Common Question Stems:
- "If the statements above are true, which one must also be true?"
- "Which one can be properly inferred from the passage?"
- "The statements above, if true, best support which of the following?"
- "Which one must be false based on the information above?"
Strategy:
- Note: These typically have NO argument, just fact sets
- Accept all stated information as absolutely true
- Look for what MUST be true, not what COULD be true
- Correct answers are often conservative, modest statements
- Eliminate answers that go beyond provided information
- Watch for conditional logic (if/then) and their contrapositives
Inference Example:
Stimulus: "All managers attend the weekly meeting. Some managers work remotely. No one who works remotely lives in the city."
Must Be True: "At least one person who attends the weekly meeting does not live in the city."
Why: Some managers work remotely (fact 2), managers attend meetings (fact 1), remote workers don't live in city (fact 3), therefore some meeting attendees don't live in city.
3. Strengthen ~14% Frequency Medium
What It Asks: Find information that makes the conclusion more likely to be true.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one, if true, most strengthens the argument?"
- "Which one provides the most support for the conclusion?"
- "The argument is most strengthened if which one is true?"
- "Which one, if true, most justifies the conclusion?"
Strategy:
- Identify the conclusion and premises
- Determine the assumption (gap between evidence and conclusion)
- Look for answers that support/confirm the assumption
- The correct answer doesn't have to prove the conclusion, just make it more likely
- Never attack the stated premises - they're accepted as true
Strengthen Formula:
\[ P + \text{Strengthen Answer} \rightarrow C \text{ (more likely)} \]
4. Assumption (Necessary) ~10% Frequency Hard
What It Asks: Identify an unstated premise that the argument REQUIRES to be valid.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one is an assumption required by the argument?"
- "The argument depends on assuming which of the following?"
- "The argument relies on which one of the following?"
- "Which one is an assumption on which the argument depends?"
Strategy:
- Identify conclusion and premises
- Find the logical GAP between evidence and claim
- Pre-phrase what's missing
- Use the Negation Test: Negate each answer - if it destroys the argument, it's necessary
Assumption Formula & Negation Test:
\[ P + A = C \]
\[ \text{If } \neg A \rightarrow \text{Argument Fails} \text{ (then A is necessary)} \]
Negation Test Example:
Argument: "The new policy will save money because it reduces paper usage."
Answer Choice: "Reducing paper usage leads to cost savings."
Negate It: "Reducing paper usage does NOT lead to cost savings."
Result: If paper reduction doesn't save money, the argument falls apart → This IS a necessary assumption ✓
5. Parallel Reasoning ~8% Frequency Very Hard
What It Asks: Find an argument with the same logical structure as the stimulus.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning most similar to that in the argument above?"
- "The reasoning in which one is most similar to that in the argument above?"
- "Which one most closely parallels the reasoning in the argument above?"
Strategy:
- Identify the logical structure (not content) of the stimulus
- Note if argument is valid or invalid
- Map the pattern: All A are B, X is A, therefore X is B
- Match structure element by element
- Eliminate answers with different structures
- Content doesn't matter - only logical form matters
⏱️ Time Management: Parallel Reasoning questions take 2-3 minutes on average (longest of all types). If you're running short on time, consider skipping these and returning if possible.
6. Weaken ~7% Frequency Medium
What It Asks: Find information that makes the conclusion less likely to be true.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one, if true, most weakens the argument?"
- "Which one casts the most doubt on the conclusion?"
- "Which one most seriously undermines the argument?"
- "Which one calls into question the argument?"
Strategy:
- Identify conclusion and premises
- Determine the assumption
- Look for answers that attack/undermine the assumption
- The correct answer doesn't have to disprove, just make conclusion less likely
- Never attack stated premises (they're accepted as true)
- Often involves alternative explanations or contrary evidence
Weaken Formula:
\[ P + \text{Weaken Answer} \not\rightarrow C \text{ (less likely)} \]
7. Method of Reasoning ~7% Frequency Hard
What It Asks: Describe HOW the argument makes its case (the argumentative technique).
Common Question Stems:
- "The argument proceeds by..."
- "Which one describes the technique of reasoning used above?"
- "The method of argument used is to..."
- "The argument does which one of the following?"
Common Methods to Recognize:
- Providing a counterexample to refute a claim
- Drawing an analogy between two situations
- Appealing to authority or expert opinion
- Citing statistical evidence or data
- Identifying a logical inconsistency
- Questioning an assumption
- Presenting alternative explanations
Strategy:
- Focus on HOW the argument works, not WHAT it says
- Describe the technique abstractly
- Match to common argumentative methods
- Eliminate answers describing techniques not present
8. Main Point / Conclusion ~7% Frequency Easy
What It Asks: Identify the primary conclusion of the argument.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one most accurately expresses the main conclusion?"
- "The main point of the argument is that..."
- "The conclusion drawn in the argument above is that..."
Strategy:
- Look for conclusion indicators (therefore, thus, so)
- Ask "What is the author trying to prove?"
- The main conclusion has support but doesn't support other claims
- Test by asking "Why?" - the main conclusion is what others answer
- Beware of intermediate conclusions that support the main point
9. Resolve the Paradox ~6% Frequency Medium
What It Asks: Explain an apparent contradiction or surprising result.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?"
- "Which one most helps to explain the surprising result?"
- "Which one, if true, helps to reconcile the two findings?"
Strategy:
- Identify the two facts that seem contradictory
- The correct answer makes BOTH facts true simultaneously
- Look for answers that provide additional information explaining the discrepancy
- Don't eliminate either fact - accept both as true
10. Sufficient Assumption (Justify) ~6% Frequency Very Hard
What It Asks: Find a statement that, if added, makes the conclusion logically certain.
Common Question Stems:
- "The conclusion follows logically if which one is assumed?"
- "Which one, if assumed, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn?"
- "Which one, if assumed, allows the conclusion to be properly inferred?"
- "The conclusion can be properly inferred if which one is assumed?"
Strategy:
- Identify the gap in the argument
- Look for an answer that completely bridges the gap
- The correct answer makes the argument 100% valid (airtight)
- Sufficient assumptions are often stronger/broader than necessary assumptions
- Test: Premises + Sufficient Assumption = Conclusion is guaranteed
Sufficient Assumption Formula:
\[ P + SA \Rightarrow C \text{ (guaranteed/certain)} \]
11. Role of Statement (Argument Part) ~5% Frequency Medium
What It Asks: Identify the function of a specific statement in the argument.
Common Question Stems:
- "The claim that [statement] plays which one of the following roles?"
- "The statement that [statement] figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?"
Strategy:
- Determine if the statement is a premise, conclusion, background, or objection
- Identify what it supports or what supports it
- Match to answer describing its structural role
12. Parallel Flaw ~3% Frequency Very Hard
What It Asks: Find an argument with the same logical flaw as the stimulus.
Common Question Stems:
- "The flawed pattern of reasoning in which one is most similar to that in the argument above?"
- "Which one contains reasoning that is most similar in its flawed reasoning to that in the argument above?"
Strategy:
- Identify the specific flaw in the stimulus
- Look for an argument with the same flaw (not just similar structure)
- All answer choices should be flawed arguments
- Match the type of flaw, not just invalidity in general
13. Point at Issue / Disagreement ~2% Frequency Medium
What It Asks: Identify what two speakers disagree about.
Common Question Stems:
- "The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that the two speakers disagree about..."
- "On the basis of their statements, [Speaker A] and [Speaker B] are committed to disagreeing about..."
Strategy:
- The correct answer must have explicit support for both speakers' positions
- One speaker says YES, the other says NO (or implies opposite)
- Eliminate if you can't find evidence for both positions
14. Evaluate the Argument ~1-2% Frequency Hard
What It Asks: Identify a question that would help assess the argument's validity.
Common Question Stems:
- "The answer to which one would be most useful in evaluating the argument?"
- "It would be most important to determine which one in evaluating the argument?"
Strategy:
- Identify the argument's assumption
- The correct answer tests the assumption - one answer strengthens, opposite weakens
- Apply the Variance Test: different answers to the question should affect argument strength differently
15. Principle Questions ~5-7% Combined Medium
Two Subtypes:
Principle (Identify): Find a general rule that governs/justifies the reasoning
- "Which principle, if valid, most helps to justify the reasoning?"
- "The reasoning above most closely conforms to which one of the following principles?"
Principle (Apply): Apply a stated principle to specific situations
- "Based on the principle above, which one is most justified?"
- "Which one conforms to the principle stated above?"
Strategy:
- For Identify: Extract the general rule from the specific case
- For Apply: Match the specific case to the general rule
- Ensure all elements of the principle/case align
Reading Comprehension includes one section with 4 passages (approximately 27 questions total). According to LSAC, these questions assess your ability to read and understand complex materials similar to those encountered in law school.
Reading Comprehension Passage Types
- Single Passages: One passage (450-500 words) with 5-8 questions
- Comparative Reading: Two shorter related passages (Passage A and Passage B) with 5-8 questions
1. Main Point / Main Idea Easy-Medium
What It Asks: Identify the central theme or primary idea of the passage.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?"
- "Which one best expresses the central idea of the passage?"
- "Which one describes the primary concern of the passage?"
Comparative Reading Variations:
- "Which one is central to both passages?"
- "Both passages seek an answer to which question?"
Strategy:
- Focus on what the MAJORITY of the passage discusses
- Look for the author's primary thesis or viewpoint
- Eliminate answers that describe only part of the passage
- The correct answer covers the whole passage, not just one paragraph
2. Primary Purpose / Function Medium
What It Asks: Identify WHY the author wrote the passage (the author's goal).
Common Question Stems:
- "The primary purpose of the passage is to..."
- "The author's main purpose in the passage is to..."
- "Which one most accurately describes what the passage is designed to do?"
Common Purposes:
- Critique or challenge a theory
- Explain a phenomenon
- Compare and contrast viewpoints
- Advocate for a position
- Describe a historical development
Strategy:
- Answer choices use abstract verbs (explain, critique, advocate)
- Focus on the author's intent, not just content
- Consider the passage's structure and progression
3. Inference / Must Be True Medium-Hard
What It Asks: Identify what must be true or can be properly inferred from the passage.
Common Question Stems:
- "The passage most strongly supports which one of the following?"
- "Based on the passage, the author would be most likely to agree with which one?"
- "Which one can be properly inferred from the passage?"
- "It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes..."
Strategy:
- The correct answer must be supported by passage text
- Look for direct textual support, not outside knowledge
- Correct answers are often modest, conservative statements
- Eliminate answers that go beyond what's stated
4. Specific Detail / Recognition Easy
What It Asks: Find specific information explicitly stated in the passage.
Common Question Stems:
- "According to the passage, which one is true?"
- "The passage states which one of the following?"
- "Which one does the author explicitly mention?"
- "The passage includes information sufficient to answer which question?"
Strategy:
- Return to the passage to locate specific information
- The answer will closely match passage wording
- These are "look-up" questions - verification, not interpretation
5. Function / Purpose of Detail Medium
What It Asks: Identify WHY the author included a specific detail or example.
Common Question Stems:
- "The author mentions [detail] primarily in order to..."
- "The function of the [paragraph/sentence] is to..."
- "The author discusses [topic] in order to..."
Strategy:
- Understand the detail's role in the author's argument
- Consider what point the detail supports
- Look at surrounding context for clues
6. Tone / Attitude Medium
What It Asks: Identify the author's attitude or tone toward the subject.
Common Question Stems:
- "The author's attitude toward [topic] can best be described as..."
- "The tone of the passage is best characterized as..."
- "Which one best describes the author's opinion of [topic]?"
Common Tones:
- Skeptical, critical, disapproving
- Supportive, approving, enthusiastic
- Neutral, objective, analytical
- Cautiously optimistic, tentatively supportive
Strategy:
- Look for evaluative language and word choice
- Note qualifiers (may, might, possibly vs. clearly, certainly)
- Eliminate extreme tones unless strongly supported
7. Structure / Organization Medium
What It Asks: Describe how the passage is organized or structured.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one most accurately describes the organization of the passage?"
- "Which one best describes the structure of the passage?"
- "The passage proceeds by..."
Strategy:
- Note the function of each paragraph
- Identify logical progression (problem→solution, theory→critique→alternative)
- Match to abstract structural descriptions
8. Strengthen / Weaken (Within Passage Context) Medium
What It Asks: Identify information that would strengthen or weaken a claim in the passage.
Common Question Stems:
- "Which one, if true, would most strengthen the author's argument?"
- "Which one most undermines the [viewpoint] described in the passage?"
Strategy:
- Similar to LR Strengthen/Weaken questions
- Identify the relevant claim or argument in the passage
- Look for answer that makes it more/less likely
9. Comparative Reading Questions Medium-Hard
What It Asks: Questions about the relationship between two passages.
Common Question Types:
- Agreement/Disagreement: "The authors would be most likely to disagree about..."
- Relationship: "Passage B relates to Passage A by..."
- Shared Elements: "Both passages mention which one?"
- Different Emphasis: "Unlike Passage A, Passage B emphasizes..."
Strategy:
- Read both passages noting similarities and differences
- Track what each author says about shared topics
- For disagreement questions, need explicit evidence from both
Strategic Question Type Priorities
Not all question types deserve equal study time. Prioritize based on frequency and your personal weaknesses.
Flaw, Must Be True, Strengthen, Assumption, Parallel
Above + Weaken, Method, Main Point
Point at Issue, Evaluate, Cannot Be True
Study Priority Framework
Tier 1: Master First (Most Impact)
- Flaw (16%): Learn all common flaw patterns
- Must Be True (14%): Practice inference and conditional logic
- Strengthen (14%): Master identifying assumptions
- Assumption (10%): Perfect the Negation Test
Tier 2: Develop Next (Significant Impact)
- Parallel Reasoning (8%): Practice structure matching
- Weaken (7%): Learn to attack assumptions
- Method (7%): Recognize argumentative techniques
- Main Point (7%): Quick wins - relatively easy
Tier 3: Maintain Competency (Lower Impact)
- Paradox (6%): Understand resolution mechanics
- Sufficient Assumption (6%): Practice gap-filling
- Principle (5-7%): Abstract thinking practice
Tier 4: Basic Familiarity (Minimal Impact)
- Point at Issue (2%): Know the approach but don't over-study
- Evaluate (1-2%): Understand variance test
- Cannot Be True (< 1%): Treat like Must Be True
Time Management by Question Type
Different question types require different amounts of time. Knowing these patterns helps you pace effectively.
| Question Type | Average Time | Time Management Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Main Point | 45-60 seconds | Quick identification - don't overthink |
| Must Be True | 60-90 seconds | Careful reading but straightforward |
| Strengthen/Weaken | 75-90 seconds | Identify assumption quickly |
| Assumption | 90-120 seconds | Use Negation Test selectively |
| Flaw | 90-120 seconds | Pattern recognition speeds this up |
| Method of Reasoning | 90-120 seconds | Abstract thinking takes time |
| Parallel Reasoning | 120-180 seconds | Longest type - consider skipping if pressed |
| Sufficient Assumption | 90-120 seconds | Gap identification is key |
| Paradox | 75-90 seconds | Resolution often clicks quickly |
Practice Resources for Question Types
Official LSAC Practice Materials
LawHub - Official LSAT Prep:
What's Available:
- Free Official LSAT Prep: Practice questions organized by type with authentic LSAT interface
- Question Type Filters: Practice specific types in isolation
- Performance Analytics: Track accuracy by question type
- Video Explanations: Learn strategies for each type
LawHub Advantage ($115/year):
- 75+ official PrepTests with hundreds of questions of each type
- Comprehensive question type breakdown
- Difficulty ratings by type
- Complete historical data on type frequencies
Official Prep Books:
- SuperPrep & SuperPrep II: Detailed explanations organized by question type
- 10 Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests: Real questions from past administrations
- Official LSAT PrepTest Series: Individual PrepTests with all question types
Question Type Mastery Plan
Progressive 12-Week Mastery Schedule
Weeks 1-2: Foundation
- Learn all question type indicators and definitions
- Study one type per day (definitions, stems, strategies)
- Complete 5-10 untimed questions of each type
- Focus on understanding, not speed
Weeks 3-4: Tier 1 Types (High Frequency)
- Deep practice on Flaw, Must Be True, Strengthen, Assumption
- 30-40 questions per type over two weeks
- Begin timing individual questions
- Create error log by type
Weeks 5-6: Tier 2 Types (Medium Frequency)
- Practice Parallel Reasoning, Weaken, Method, Main Point
- 20-30 questions per type
- Timed practice with type-appropriate time limits
- Identify personal weak types
Weeks 7-8: Tier 3 & Integration
- Practice remaining types
- Take full LR sections with mixed types
- Track performance by type
- Extra practice on personal weak types
Weeks 9-10: Weak Type Focus
- Intensive practice on your 3 weakest types
- 50+ questions per weak type
- Study explanations for correct answers too
- Refine type-specific strategies
Weeks 11-12: Full Test Practice
- Complete full practice tests
- Apply all type-specific strategies
- Continue monitoring type performance
- Quick review drills on all types
Common Mistakes by Question Type
Type-Specific Pitfalls to Avoid
Assumption Questions:
- ❌ Selecting sufficient instead of necessary assumptions
- ❌ Choosing answers that strengthen but aren't required
- ✓ Use Negation Test to verify necessity
Must Be True Questions:
- ❌ Selecting what "could be true" instead of "must be true"
- ❌ Bringing in outside knowledge
- ✓ Be conservative - choose modest, well-supported answers
Flaw Questions:
- ❌ Describing reasoning that isn't in the argument
- ❌ Attacking premises (they must be accepted as true)
- ✓ Match to specific flaw patterns
Parallel Reasoning Questions:
- ❌ Matching content instead of structure
- ❌ Not checking if validity matches
- ✓ Map abstract structure: All A are B, X is A, so X is B
Strengthen/Weaken Questions:
- ❌ Attacking stated premises
- ❌ Choosing answers out of argument scope
- ✓ Focus on supporting/attacking the assumption
Frequently Asked Questions
The LSAT has approximately 13-15 different Logical Reasoning question types and 8-10 Reading Comprehension question types. The exact number varies slightly depending on how they're categorized, but the core Logical Reasoning types include: Assumption (Necessary and Sufficient), Strengthen, Weaken, Flaw in the Reasoning, Inference (Must Be True), Main Point, Method of Reasoning, Role of Statement, Parallel Reasoning, Parallel Flaw, Resolve the Paradox, Point at Issue, Evaluate the Argument, and Principle questions. Reading Comprehension includes Main Point, Primary Purpose, Inference, Specific Detail, Function/Purpose, Tone/Attitude, Structure/Organization, and Comparative Reading questions. Understanding each type's unique characteristics and strategies is essential for LSAT success.
The most common LSAT Logical Reasoning question types by frequency are: Flaw in the Reasoning (approximately 16% of all LR questions), Must Be True/Inference (14%), Strengthen (14%), Assumption (10%), Parallel Reasoning (8%), Weaken (7%), Method of Reasoning (7%), and Main Point (7%). Together, these eight types account for over 80% of all Logical Reasoning questions on the LSAT. For Reading Comprehension, the most common question types are Inference, Main Point/Main Idea, and Function/Purpose questions. Prioritizing study time on these high-frequency types maximizes your potential score improvement.
Assumption questions ask you to identify an UNSTATED premise that the argument REQUIRES to be valid—something the author takes for granted without stating. The correct answer must be necessary for the argument to work. You can test this with the Negation Test: if negating the answer destroys the argument, it's a necessary assumption. Inference questions (Must Be True) ask you to identify what MUST be true based on the stated information in the passage. Inference questions typically present fact sets without arguments (no conclusion to prove), while Assumption questions always have arguments with conclusions. The key difference: Assumptions are unstated premises that arguments depend on; Inferences are conclusions that must follow from stated facts. Use the formula: Premises + Assumption = Conclusion (for Assumptions) vs. Facts → What Must Be True (for Inferences).
Identify LSAT question types by reading the question stem carefully and looking for key indicator words and phrases. Assumption questions use phrases like "assumption required," "depends on assuming," or "relies on which assumption." Strengthen questions use "most strengthens," "provides support for," or "most helps justify." Weaken questions use "most weakens," "casts doubt on," or "undermines the argument." Flaw questions use "vulnerable to criticism," "reasoning is flawed," or "error in reasoning." Inference questions use "must be true," "properly inferred," or "if the statements are true." Main Point questions ask for "main conclusion," "primary claim," or "main point." Method questions ask "the argument proceeds by" or "technique of reasoning used." With 50-100 hours of practice using official LSAT materials, you'll recognize these patterns instantly and automatically know which strategy to apply.
The hardest LSAT question types are generally: Parallel Reasoning and Parallel Flaw (because you must match complex logical structures element-by-element under time pressure, and these take 2-3 minutes each), Sufficient Assumption (Justify) questions (because you need to identify an answer that completely and perfectly bridges the logical gap to make the conclusion guaranteed), Method of Reasoning questions (because they require abstract understanding of argumentative techniques rather than concrete analysis), and Evaluate the Argument questions (because they're rare, so you get less practice, and they test multiple skills simultaneously). However, difficulty is individual—some students struggle more with Flaw questions (pattern recognition) while others find Assumptions harder (identifying gaps). Track your personal accuracy by type to identify which are hardest FOR YOU, then allocate extra study time accordingly.
No, you should NOT study all LSAT question types equally. Prioritize your study time strategically based on two factors: frequency and personal weakness. Focus most on high-frequency types: Flaw (16%), Must Be True (14%), Strengthen (14%), and Assumption (10%) which together account for over 50% of Logical Reasoning questions. Spend significantly less time on rare types like Cannot Be True (less than 1%), Point at Issue (2%), and Evaluate the Argument (1-2%). Within high-frequency types, concentrate extra effort on those where your personal accuracy is lowest. Track your performance by type using LawHub's analytics to identify which need the most attention. For example, if you're getting 90% of Main Point questions correct but only 60% of Flaw questions, dedicate more time to Flaws even though Main Point appears almost as frequently. This strategic, data-driven approach maximizes score improvement per hour studied.
The fundamental formula for Assumption questions is: Premises + Assumption = Conclusion. To solve systematically: 1) Identify the conclusion (what the author wants to prove), 2) Identify the premises (the evidence given), 3) Find the logical GAP between the evidence and the conclusion, 4) The assumption fills this gap by connecting evidence to claim. For Necessary Assumption questions, use the Negation Test to verify: negate each answer choice—if negating it DESTROYS the argument (makes the conclusion no longer follow from the premises), it's a necessary assumption. If negating it has no effect or only weakens the argument slightly, it's not necessary. For example, if an argument says "Sales increased 20%, therefore profits will rise," the necessary assumption is "increased sales lead to increased profits" (not considering that costs might have also increased). Negate it: "increased sales DON'T lead to increased profits"—this destroys the argument, confirming it's necessary.
Strengthen and Weaken questions both test your understanding of arguments but work in opposite directions. Strengthen questions ask you to find information that makes the conclusion MORE likely to be true by supporting the argument's assumptions, providing additional confirming evidence, or eliminating alternative explanations. Weaken questions ask you to find information that makes the conclusion LESS likely to be true by attacking/undermining assumptions, providing contrary evidence, or introducing alternative explanations. Both require first identifying the argument's assumption (the unstated connection between premises and conclusion). To strengthen, you support or confirm that assumption. To weaken, you attack or undermine that assumption. Important: neither type requires PROVING or DISPROVING the conclusion—just making it more or less likely. Also, you can never attack the stated premises themselves (they must be accepted as true); you can only attack the connection between premises and conclusion.
LSAT Reading Comprehension question types include: Main Point/Main Idea (asks for the central theme or primary idea), Primary Purpose (asks WHY the author wrote the passage—to critique, explain, advocate, etc.), Inference (asks what must be true or can be properly inferred based on passage content), Specific Detail (asks about explicit information directly stated), Function/Purpose (asks why the author included specific details or examples), Tone/Attitude (asks about the author's perspective—skeptical, supportive, neutral), Structure/Organization (asks how the passage is constructed), Strengthen/Weaken (asks what would support or undermine claims in the passage), and Comparative Reading questions (ask about relationships between two passages—agreement, disagreement, shared elements). Each Reading Comprehension passage typically has 5-8 questions covering multiple types, testing both comprehension and critical analysis skills.
Practice LSAT question types using official LSAC materials through LawHub at lsac.org/lsat/prep. Free Official LSAT Prep provides authentic questions organized by type for targeted practice, allowing you to focus on specific types where you need improvement. LawHub Advantage ($115 for one year) includes 75+ official PrepTests with hundreds of questions of each type from real LSAT administrations, plus performance analytics that track your accuracy by question type. LSAC also publishes official prep books including SuperPrep and SuperPrep II with detailed explanations organized by question type, and the Official LSAT PrepTest series with individual PrepTests containing all question types. Always use official LSAC materials rather than third-party resources to ensure authentic question construction, accurate difficulty levels, and answer patterns that precisely match the actual LSAT. Only official materials guarantee you're practicing with real LSAT question types exactly as they appear on test day.
Advanced Question Type Strategies
Pattern Recognition Accelerators
After 100+ Questions of Each Type, You'll Notice:
Flaw Questions:
- The same 10-12 flaw patterns repeat constantly
- Causation flaws appear in ~30% of flaw questions
- Wrong answers often describe reasoning that isn't present
Assumption Questions:
- Gaps often involve scope shifts (evidence about X, conclusion about Y)
- Wrong answers are often sufficient but not necessary
- Correct answers sound obvious once you see them
Parallel Reasoning:
- Eliminate mismatches quickly (All vs. Some, sufficient vs. necessary)
- Validity must match (both valid or both invalid)
- Start with the shortest answers to save time
Must Be True:
- Correct answers are often compound statements combining multiple facts
- Conditional logic appears frequently - master contrapositives
- Wrong answers go one step too far beyond what's stated
Question Type Performance Tracking
Use this framework to monitor your progress and identify areas needing attention:
| Question Type | Target Accuracy | Your Current % | Questions Needed | Priority Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flaw | 85%+ | ____% | 80-100 | High (16% frequency) |
| Must Be True | 80%+ | ____% | 70-90 | High (14% frequency) |
| Strengthen | 85%+ | ____% | 70-90 | High (14% frequency) |
| Assumption | 85%+ | ____% | 60-80 | High (10% frequency) |
| Parallel Reasoning | 75%+ | ____% | 40-50 | Medium (8% but time-intensive) |
| Weaken | 85%+ | ____% | 40-50 | Medium (7% frequency) |
| Method | 80%+ | ____% | 40-50 | Medium (7% frequency) |
| Main Point | 90%+ | ____% | 30-40 | Medium (7%, relatively easy) |
When You've Mastered Question Types
Signs of Mastery:
- ✓ You identify question type within 2-3 seconds of reading the stem
- ✓ You automatically apply the correct strategy for each type
- ✓ You achieve 80%+ accuracy on all high-frequency types
- ✓ You complete most questions within recommended time limits
- ✓ You recognize common patterns and traps for each type
- ✓ You can articulate why wrong answers are wrong for each type
- ✓ Your error rate is consistent across types (no major weaknesses)
Next Steps After Mastery:
- Take full-length practice tests to integrate all types under time pressure
- Focus on advanced timing strategies and section management
- Practice with the hardest PrepTest questions (PT 70+)
- Refine your ability to identify trap answers specific to each type
- Work on mental stamina for maintaining performance across full sections
Final Strategies for Test Day
Question Type Approach on Test Day
- Identify Type Immediately: Read question stem first to know which strategy to use
- Apply Type-Specific Strategy: Don't use generic approach—each type has optimal tactics
- Know When to Skip: If a Parallel Reasoning question looks brutal and you're behind on time, skip and return
- Trust Pattern Recognition: Your brain will recognize patterns after sufficient practice—trust your instincts
- Don't Mix Strategies: Use Negation Test for Assumptions, not Strengthen questions—keep strategies distinct
- Track Difficult Types: Mark questions from your weak types for review if time permits
- Adjust Time Allocation: Spend less time on easy types (Main Point) to save time for hard types (Parallel, Flaw)
- Stay Calm on Rare Types: If you encounter a rare type like Evaluate or Cannot Be True, stay calm and apply fundamentals
Additional Official Resources
Continue your LSAT preparation with these official LSAC resources organized by question type practice:
Official LSAC Resources:
- LSAC Official Website: LSAC.org - Complete LSAT information
- Official LSAT Prep (LawHub): LawHub Platform - Question type filters and practice
- Question Type Information: Official Question Types - LSAC's description of all types
- Logical Reasoning Details: Official LR Description - What's tested in each type
- Reading Comprehension Details: Official RC Description - Question type breakdown
- Sample Questions: Official Sample Questions - Examples of each type
The Question Type Mastery Formula:
\[ \text{Type Recognition} + \text{Type Strategy} + \text{Pattern Practice} = \text{Mastery} \]
\[ M = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (F_i \times A_i) \]
Where M = Overall Score, F = Frequency of type i, A = Your accuracy on type i
This shows why high-frequency type mastery has the greatest impact on your score.
Understanding every LSAT question type and developing type-specific strategies is fundamental to achieving your target score. Each of the 13-15 Logical Reasoning types and 8-10 Reading Comprehension types tests different skills and requires different approaches. By prioritizing high-frequency types, tracking your performance by type, and practicing extensively with official LSAC materials through LawHub, you'll develop the pattern recognition and strategic expertise needed for LSAT excellence. Start your systematic question type practice today, focus on your weakest areas, and watch your score improve as you master each type's unique characteristics and optimal approach.
⚠️ Important Reminder: Always practice with official LSAC materials. Third-party questions often have incorrect difficulty levels, inaccurate question type construction, and answer patterns that don't match real LSAT questions. Only official materials from LSAC guarantee authentic question types exactly as they appear on test day. Access official practice through LawHub at lsac.org/lsat/prep.
