Calculator

AP to IB Conversions (2025 Guide)

ranslate AP coursework to IB terms the smart way. Methods, examples, credit rules, pitfalls, and a plain-English FAQ covering AP to IB conversions.

AP to IB Conversions (2025): A No-Drama, Deep-Dive Field Manual for Students, Parents, and Counselors

AP → IB Conversions (subject-level + total)

Defaults: AP 5→IB 7, 4→6 • HL/SL offsets • Top‑6 picker

Add your AP exams

This tool provides a planning heuristic: AP scores map to estimated IB subject grades, with optional level offsets. Many universities treat 5 ≈ 7 and 4 ≈ 6, but policies vary—tune the mapping below.
#AP subjectAP scoreTarget IB levelPredicted IB gradeIncludedActions

Results

Add exams to see per‑subject IB grades, a top‑six total (max 42) plus optional core points (max 45).
Included subjects: —
HL in set: —

Mapping & settings

Top‑N picker keeps the highest predicted IB grades (ties by order). Offsets adjust HL/SL target difficulty (e.g., HL −1).

Notes

There is no universal, official AP→IB conversion. This tool uses a widely seen shorthand (5≈7, 4≈6) and lets you calibrate per your institution. IB total is capped at 42 for six subjects; adding core points (TOK/EE, 0–3) yields a maximum of 45.

Why you’re here (and what you’ll get)

You’ve got AP classes, you’re dealing with IB requirements (or vice versa), and every website speaks a different dialect. This guide translates calmly and precisely:

  • What AP (Advanced Placement) and IB (International Baccalaureate) actually measure

  • When “ap to ib conversion” is useful—and when it’s a trap

  • Clear, defensible conversion methods you can document on applications

  • Worked examples (subject mapping, workload, credit, and rigor)

  • How different regions (U.S., U.K./EU, Canada, Middle East/Asia, Australia/NZ) read AP and IB

  • A laser-focused FAQ addressing the exact phrases students search—like ap ib, ap and ib, ap ib meaning, ib to ap conversion, ap to ib, and even ib exame

This is not a hype piece. It’s your practical field manual.


Quick primer: AP vs IB in one screen

AP (Advanced Placement)

  • U.S.-centric program of single, college-level subjects taught in high school (e.g., AP Calculus AB, AP Biology).

  • You earn a course grade on your transcript, separately an exam score (1–5).

  • Schools often weight AP in GPA (+0.5 or +1.0).

  • Colleges may grant credit/placement for 3–5s, depending on campus/policy.

IB (International Baccalaureate)

  • A full Diploma Programme (DP) framework with six subjects split into HL (Higher Level) and SL (Standard Level) plus the Core: Theory of Knowledge (TOK), Extended Essay (EE), and CAS.

  • Subjects are graded 1–7; diploma is out of 45 (42 from subjects + 3 Core points).

  • Many universities read HL like deep study (closest in spirit to A-Level or college-prep depth).

  • IB courses can also be taken as Certificates (single subjects) without the full diploma.

Core truth: AP is modular; IB DP is a whole-program architecture. That’s why “AP ↔ IB” is translation, not arithmetic.


When “AP → IB” conversion helps (and when it doesn’t)

Legit use cases

  • You’re moving from an AP school to an IB school and need a placement (e.g., whether you’re ready for IB Math AA HL).

  • A university publishes IB-style subject expectations and you want to sanity-check how your AP portfolio satisfies comparable HL depth or subject prerequisites.

  • You’re writing an explanatory note in an application (“Here’s how my AP work aligns with the IB rigor expected by this program”).

Shaky use cases

  • Trying to assign a single IB point number to a stack of AP classes. AP doesn’t produce a 45-point diploma total.

  • Treating AP exam scores (1–5) as if they were IB 1–7 grades one-for-one. They’re not the same scale, not the same rubric.

  • Using an internet “calculator” with no documentation. If the method isn’t explicit, admissions won’t trust it—and neither should you.

Rule of thumb: Use conversion as a narrative bridge, not as “official math.”


Three smart ways to translate AP → IB (and back) without breaking logic

You don’t need a magic spreadsheet; you need transparent principles you can cite.

Method A — Depth & content mapping (subject-by-subject)

Goal: Show that your AP coursework covers the depth an IB course—especially HL—expects.

  1. Check the syllabus match: e.g., AP Calculus BC typically maps more cleanly to IB Math AA HL depth than AP Calculus AB does.

  2. Bundle coverage when needed: sometimes two APs together (e.g., AP Physics 1 + 2) approximate the breadth of IB Physics HL more than a single AP will.

  3. Flag labs & writing: IB sciences and EE/TOK demand lab write-ups and extended analytical writing; note equivalent AP lab experiences or research projects if relevant.

Deliverable: a short line like, “My AP Physics 1 & 2 sequence plus lab portfolio align with the experimental and theoretical depth typical of IB Physics HL; AP Calc BC supports the math demands of IB HL sciences.”

Method B — Rigor evidence (credit/placement policies)

Goal: Use university credit policies as a proxy signal for rigor.

  • If a university grants sophomore credit for AP Calc BC (score 5) and advanced standing for IB Math AA HL (score 6/7), you can argue they represent comparable readiness for second-year math.

  • Cross-reference department pages; a CS department may prefer IB Math AA HL or AP Calc BC for discrete math readiness, whereas IB Math AI HL or AP Statistics map better to data-centric majors.

Deliverable: “At X University, AP Calc BC 5 and IB Math AA HL 6 both unlock Calculus II credit; this suggests my AP profile meets their HL-level math readiness.”

Method C — Course-load parity (time & assessment)

Goal: Contextualize effort and assessment.

  • IB HL courses include internal assessments and externals; AP includes coursework and a high-stakes exam.

  • Map your AP course count and exam load to the IB rhythm (6 subjects, with 3 HL typical).

  • Emphasize TOK/EE-like writing if you have AP Seminar/Research, capstones, or extended lab reports.

Deliverable: “Over two years I completed 6 APs (Calc BC, Physics 1/2, Chem, Lang, Gov) with extensive lab reports and a research capstone; this stands in for the sustained assessment pattern of three IB HLs plus Core writing.”

Note: None of these methods yields a numerical IB score. They yield evidence of equivalence in substance, depth, and assessment—the currency admissions actually respect.


Worked comparisons (illustrative, not official)

Below are indicative mappings used by counselors to describe rigor—always double-check with course syllabi and the receiving institution.

DomainIB Course (HL)AP course(s) that often approximate depth
Mathematics (pure)IB Math AA HLAP Calculus BC (+ sometimes AP Statistics for breadth)
Mathematics (applied)IB Math AI HLAP Statistics + strong algebra/calculus background (often AP Calc AB helpful)
PhysicsIB Physics HLAP Physics C: Mechanics (+ E&M if available) or AP Physics 1+2 with strong calculus support
ChemistryIB Chemistry HLAP Chemistry
BiologyIB Biology HLAP Biology (+ lab portfolio emphasis)
Computer ScienceIB CS HLAP Computer Science A (+ projects; some schools add AP CSA + AP CSP)
EconomicsIB Economics HLAP Microeconomics + AP Macroeconomics
EnglishIB English A HL (Lit or Lang/Lit)AP English Literature & Composition and/or AP English Language & Composition
HistoryIB History HLAP World/Euro/U.S. History (one is not breadth-equivalent; content focus differs—explain your region/time strengths)
LanguagesIB Language B HLAP Language (target language) with evidence of advanced writing/speaking

Takeaway: Single APs sometimes under-approximate IB HL breadth. Stack strategically or emphasize projects/writing to “close the loop.”


Admissions reality by region (fast but useful)

  • United States: Colleges understand AP deeply and IB well. Many recalculate GPA and look at course rigor + grades first, scores second. They accept both AP and IB; for STEM, math track rigor (AP Calc BC / IB AA HL) matters.

  • U.K./Europe: Offers are typically grade-based (A-Levels or IB HL minima). APs can be accepted (often 3–5 APs at 4/5), but check each course’s small print for subject prerequisites.

  • Canada: Both AP and IB are respected; many universities publish advanced standing charts for AP 4/5 and IB HL 5–7.

  • Australia/NZ: They interpret AP and IB with local rank/ATAR contexts. IB has predictable recognition; AP acceptance varies by institution and faculty.

  • Middle East/Asia: Recognition depends on the destination university’s home policy; many branch campuses follow U.S./U.K. norms.

Golden rule: Cite the course page. If the program says “IB: 35 with 6,6,5 at HL,” explain how your AP set demonstrates equivalent rigor and subject readiness.


Self-reporting template (use this on applications)

When a portal doesn’t natively understand both systems, paste a concise note:

Conversion note (AP → IB context):
“I completed 6 AP courses/exams (Calc BC 5, Physics C Mech 5, Chemistry 5, Biology 4, English Lang 5, Macro 5). Based on depth and credit policies at [target universities], AP Calc BC 5 and AP Chem 5 typically align with IB HL-level rigor in Math AA and Chemistry. My lab portfolio and extended research paper (AP Seminar/Research) provide writing and inquiry evidence similar to IB Internal Assessments and Core (TOK/EE) expectations.”

That’s the kind of clarity admissions appreciates.


Common pitfalls (and preventative medicine)

  • Pitfall: Assigning a fake “IB 38/45” number to a pile of APs.
    Fix: Translate subject depth, not “points.”

  • Pitfall: Treating AP 5 = IB 7 as a universal axiom.
    Fix: Scales differ; lean on credit/placement evidence instead.

  • Pitfall: Ignoring writing/lab components.
    Fix: Show IA-like evidence (lab notebooks, capstones, seminar papers).

  • Pitfall: Overloading APs with weak grades.
    Fix: Rigor + performance beats raw quantity. IB readers (and AP readers) notice coherence.


Extended FAQs (featuring every requested keyword exactly)

The following entries include the exact search phrases—ib exame, ap ib, ap and ib, ap ib meaning, ap to ib conversion, ib to ap conversion, and ap to ib—with practical, no-nonsense answers. Keep them intact if you republish.

1) ib exame — what does this phrase refer to?

ib exame” is commonly a misspelling or a non-English spelling of IB exam (sometimes “exame” appears in Lusophone contexts). It refers to the external assessments IB students sit at the end of their courses (May/November sessions), plus the internal assessments moderated by IB. For conversion purposes, IB exam grades (1–7) represent performance in IB courses; they are not directly comparable to an AP 1–5 score without context. Use subject depth mapping and university credit tables rather than trying to equate numbers one-for-one.

2) ap ib — how do colleges read “ap ib” on a transcript?

When admissions folks talk about “ap ib,” they usually mean rigor signals. Both AP and IB indicate you sought advanced coursework. Committees read:

  • Which subjects you pushed to the limit (Calc, Physics, Chem, Literature, Languages).

  • How well you performed (grades + scores).

  • Whether your advanced choices fit the degree you want (e.g., engineering needs math/physics depth).
    They don’t require you to convert AP to IB numerically; they need proof of readiness, which both pathways deliver when executed well.

3) ap and ib — which is “better” and how should I decide?

ap and ib” isn’t a rivalry; it’s a fit equation.

  • Choose AP if your school offers strong AP subject menus and you want modular freedom (pick 4–7 APs that map to your intended major).

  • Choose IB DP if you want a structured six-subject program with HL/SL depth and Core (TOK/EE/CAS) that trains writing, research, and reflection.
    In admissions, neither is universally “better.” The right rigor, good grades, and subject alignment with your intended major are what matter.

4) ap ib meaning — what’s the precise ap ib meaning in applications?

The phrase ap ib meaning asks: How does an admissions reader interpret AP and IB together? Short answer: as signals of curriculum rigor. AP shows modular college-level courses; IB shows sustained programmatic depth plus Core writing. When a degree page lists IB HL prerequisites, you can reference AP course/exam combinations that demonstrate equivalent depth, then cite a credit/placement policy as evidence.

5) ap to ib conversion — is there a standard ap to ib conversion table?

No single official table exists. Use the three methods above:

  • Depth & content mapping (syllabuses, lab work, writing).

  • Credit/placement parity (university charts that grant similar standing to AP 4/5 and IB HL 6/7).

  • Course-load parity (quantity + quality over two years).
    Document your method in a short note; avoid claiming an “IB total out of 45.”

6) ib to ap conversion — can I go the other way with confidence?

Same answer: there’s no universal ib to ap conversion. To map IB → AP, describe which IB HL subjects cover content at least comparable to AP courses (e.g., IB Chemistry HL aligns well with AP Chemistry; IB Math AA HL aligns strongly with AP Calculus BC). Where evidence exists (credit policies, placement tests), cite it.

7) ap to ib — if I must summarize ap to ib on a form, what’s the smartest move?

Use words, not fake numbers:

“My AP set (Calc BC, Physics C Mech, Chemistry, English Lang, Macro, Bio) demonstrates HL-level rigor in math/science and sustained analytical writing. University credit tables at X and Y treat AP Calc BC 5 and IB Math AA HL 6/7 as advanced standing, indicating comparable readiness.”

That answer lands better than any unverified “AP → 38/45” shortcut.


How to argue equivalence credibly (short playbook)

  1. Start from the destination: What does the degree page demand (IB HL subjects/grades, portfolio, lab work)?

  2. Match AP assets to each demand**:** syllabi, labs, capstones, long-form writing, math readiness.

  3. Demonstrate parity: Find credit/placement rules that treat your AP results similarly to IB HL results.

  4. Write a 3-sentence note: “Here’s the requirement; here’s my AP proof; here’s a published policy backing the equivalence.”

  5. Never invent an IB total score for AP. Focus on readiness, rigor, and outcomes.


Example student profiles (to copy and adapt)

STEM-bound (Engineering)

  • AP: Calc BC (5), Physics C Mech (5), Physics C E&M (4), Chemistry (5), CS A (5), English Lang (4).

  • Equivalence note: “Calc BC and Physics C sequence matches the depth expected of IB Math AA HL and IB Physics HL. My lab notebooks and extended reports parallel IB IA expectations.”

Humanities-bound (Law/IR)

  • AP: English Lit (5), English Lang (5), World History (5), U.S. History (4), Government (5), Macro (4), Spanish Lang (4).

  • Equivalence note: “Dual English APs, two heavy history APs, and Government demonstrate reading/writing depth comparable to IB English A HL + IB History HL, with extended essays akin to IB Core writing.”

Data/Business-bound

  • AP: Statistics (5), Calc AB (4), Economics Micro (5), Macro (5), Computer Science A (4), English Lang (4).

  • Equivalence note: “Statistics, calculus, and econ pairings map to IB Math AI HL + IB Economics HL outcomes; coding projects provide quantitative depth complementary to IB requirements.”


Where GPA enters the chat (briefly)

Some applications ask for GPA while you’re explaining AP↔IB. Keep it clean:

  • Unweighted GPA (4.0): A=4, B=3, etc.

  • Weighted GPA: add your school’s AP bump (+0.5/+1.0) and cap if any (5.0/6.0).

  • If you want to mention IB to GPA (for context), use a labeled estimate like:

    • Linear: (IB total ÷ 45) × 4.0

    • Or subject mapping (7→4.0, 6→3.7, 5→3.3…) with HL +0.5 if your school uses weighting.

  • Always label assumptions; many colleges recalculate anyway.


Micro-glossary (because jargon shouldn’t gatekeep)

  • HL/SL: Higher Level / Standard Level in IB; HL ≈ deeper content and more hours.

  • TOK/EE/CAS: IB Core—critical thinking, research paper (4,000 words), and creativity/activity/service.

  • AP 1–5: AP exam scale (3=qualified, 4=well-qualified, 5=extremely well-qualified).

  • Credit/Placement: University policy granting course credit or letting you skip intro classes.

  • Placement Exam: Department test to check readiness irrespective of AP/IB scores.


Final checklist before you hit submit

  • Did you map subjects (not just numbers)?

  • Did you cite a credit/placement policy or departmental note where possible?

  • Did you keep the focus on readiness for the specific degree (math for engineering, writing for humanities, etc.)?

  • Did you avoid assigning a fake IB total to APs?

  • Did you write a short conversion note you can paste into any application?

If yes, your conversion story is bullet-proof and reviewer-friendly.


TL;DR (for the skimmers)

  • AP ↔ IB has no single official formula.

  • Translate using subject depth, credit/placement parity, and workload/assessment parallels.

  • Keep the narrative major-aligned (math for STEM, writing for humanities).

  • Use a short, transparent note; never invent an IB “/45” number for AP.

  • Admissions value clarity, rigor, and fit over calculator theatrics.

Shares: